Elastic collision between an unknown mass and an alpha particle

pentazoid
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In an elastic collision between an alpha particle and an unknown nucleus at rest, the alpha particle was deflected through a right angle and lost 40 percent of its energy . Identify the mysterious nucleus.

Homework Equations



(E2)/(E0)=[4*gamma/(gamma+1)^2]*(sin(phi/2))^2

\theta2=.5*(pi-phi)

gamma is the ratio between the alpha mass particle and the unknown mass

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the deflected angle the recoil angle? If so then I can use the recoil angle to find phi. Then I can use phi to find gamma and with gamma since I know the mass of an alpha particle, I can find the unknown mass. When the problem says the recoil angle loses 40 % of its energy , doesn't that mean E2=.4E0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pentazoid said:
Is the deflected angle the recoil angle? If so then I can use the recoil angle to find phi. Then I can use phi to find gamma and with gamma since I know the mass of an alpha particle, I can find the unknown mass. When the problem says the recoil angle loses 40 % of its energy , doesn't that mean E2=.4E0

Hi pentazoid! :smile:

Yes, the deflected angle is the recoil angle …

but no, E2=.6E0 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi pentazoid! :smile:

Yes, the deflected angle is the recoil angle …

but no, E2=.6E0 :wink:

if my deflected angle is 90 degrees that means my phi is zero. which means sin(phi/2) is zero, which means then that there is no way to determine what the unknown mass is
 
pentazoid said:
if my deflected angle is 90 degrees that means my phi is zero. which means sin(phi/2) is zero, which means then that there is no way to determine what the unknown mass is

I'm confused :confused:

isn't φ = π/2?
 
pentazoid said:
Is the deflected angle the recoil angle?
Not if you mean the angle that the nucleas recoils. Conservation of energy and momentum determine this recoil angle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top