Elastic Collisions in one dimension

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision scenario, particle 1 (0.30 kg) moving at 2.0 m/s collides with stationary particle 2 (0.40 kg). After the collision, particle 1 moves left at -2 m/s, while particle 2 moves right at 3 m/s. Particle 2 then bounces off a wall at 70 cm without losing speed. To find the collision point of the two particles, calculations involve determining their positions over time using their velocities. The final position of the collision was found to be -28 cm after correcting a conversion error.
patelkey
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Particle 1 of mass m1 = 0.30 kg slides rightward along an x-axis on a frictionless floor with a speed of 2.0 m/s. When it reaches x = 0, it undergoes a one-dimensional elastic collision with stationary particle 2 of mass m2 = 0.40 kg. When particle 2 then reaches a wall at xw = 70 cm, it bounces from it with no loss of speed. At what position on the x-axis does particle 2 then collide with particle 1?

Homework Equations




1/2m1v1i^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2
3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b
I found all the values in the equation however, I don't know how to apply that to figure out the position where they will collide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that's good, but you need another conserved quantity to solve the equation. Have you tried using conservation of momentum?

m_1 v_{1i} = m_1 v_{1f} + m_2 v_{2f}
 
After using the equation you gave me I got v2f=3m/s and v1f=-2m/s
but what do I do with these two quantities to figure out the point of collision?
 
okay, so one is moving left at 2 m/s (v_{1f} = -2 \frac{m}{s}) and one is moving right at 3 m/s (v_{2f} = 3 \frac{m}{s}.

Another important fact is the particle loses no speed when it hits the wall, so you may assume it just changes direction with the same speed.
(side note: technically, to conserve momentum, you have to assume the wall it hits moves backwards as well, but you can say that the mass of the wall is so huge it barely moves, so m_1 v_{1i}= m_1 v_{1f} + m_{wall} v_{wall} \rightarrow \frac{m_1}{m_{wall}} (v_{1i} - v_{1f}) = v_{wall}, but m_{wall} >> m_1 so v_{wall} is approx 0 )

You can start by calculating how far the one moving left at 2 m/s will get from the point of collision (say x_0 = 0) when the one moving right hits the wall, and then find how long it will take for them to meet with the simple equations:

x_1 (t) = v_{1f} t + x_1
<br /> x_2 (t) = v_{2f} t + x_2<br />

where x_1, x_2 are the initial positions of the masses respectively from the point of collision at the time the second particle strikes the wall,

and find when x_1(t) = x_2 (t), solve for that time and plug it in one of the equations to get the distance.

however, there is a slightly more clever way, using the same methods, where you can solve for it in one less step. In what way can you move the particle and slightly change the situation such that the time the particle takes to get to the wall and back in the original situation is the same but it involves no wall?
 
I got it
It turned out I was entering -0.28 cm but I forgot to convert it so it was actually -28 cm thanks for the help
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top