Electric field and total charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total charge and electric field for a cylinder with a charge density proportional to the distance from its central axis. For part (a), confusion arises regarding the correct expression for total charge, with participants debating whether to use volume or surface area in their calculations. In parts (b) and (c), there is uncertainty about the electric field inside and outside the cylinder, with references to cylindrical symmetry and Gauss' Law. The participants explore integrating the charge density and the implications of the cylinder's length on the calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying theoretical concepts to practical problems in electrostatics.
uchicago2012
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Charge is distributed through an infinitely long cylinder of radius R in such a way that the charge density is proportional to the distance from the central axis: ß = A r, where A is a constant and ß is the density.
(a) Calculate the total charge contained in a segment of the cylinder of length L.
(b) Calculate the electric field for points outside the cylinder.
(c) Calculate the electric field for points inside the cylinder.

Homework Equations


Gauss' Law

The Attempt at a Solution


so for a)
dQ = p(r) V dr
right? or is it
dQ = p(r) A dr
I can't decide. It says charge is distributed throughout the cylinder but in my book we always seem to use surface areas so I'm confused.
But if I go with my first equation and integrate to find the total charge, Q
Q = integral (A * r * pi * R2 * L * dr)
where r = distance of point from central axis and R = radius of cylinder
then = A * pi * R2 * L * integral r dr
which = (A * pi * R4 * L)/2
I integrated from 0 to R which leaves out half of the cylinder so I'm not so sure what to do about that... should I integrate to 2R intsead?
As far as for b and c, I can't see why they'd be different. My book talks about cylindrical symmetry and says
E = linear charge density/(2 * pi *e0 * r)
which is the electric field E due to an infinitely long, straight line of charge, at a point that is a radial distance r from the line. So wouldn't they be the same, with different r's? Perhaps for the one inside the surface, the density B = A * r would cancel with the r on the bottom. Or instead of this equation, should I go back and say:
e0 * E * A = q
and use my q from before, if it's even right?
And should I use the area or the volume then, for this part?

Ugh this electric stuff confuses me. I miss gravity...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ß = A r tells density at any part at distance x from central axis.
this charge at x will be distributed along the circumference of that little part dx at distnce x

so dQ = dx * ß
where B will be A xwhat is that p(r) ?
 
p(r) is density as a function of r. Sorry I switched the symbols, I'm used to using rho. So is r a constant then? I thought it was a variable, because it said A was a constant and B was the density, so I thought B varied in accordance with r, which would be the distance from the central axis. Then the R would be the actual radius of the cylinder. But you think it's a constant?
 
i didnt say its a constant ... did i?

i just used the expression to find charge dQ at distance x, now x is variable ...(thats why eqn include dx)

and dint worry about the radius stuff ... density given is linear
 
Right, I see. So then Q = Ax2/2. But what does length L have to do with the integral? X is the distance from the central axis, so I don't see how to incorporate L into that.
 
what will be the limits of integral?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top