Electric Field at a Specific Point due to Two Charges

Jgs19
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey I'm a new time member but I hope to use this forum for my college Physics 2 class, anyways:

1. Question: Two charges are D = 2.5 m apart and lie on the x-axis. What must be the magnitude of the charge on the right one, Q2, (in C) so that the electric field is zero at x = 1.75 meters. Let Q1 be at the origin and have a charge 17 C.

2. Equations I'm using.
E(total)=E1+E2...
E=k*q/r^2

3. My attempt:
E1=(8.99E9)(17C) / (1.75^2) = 4.990E10
E2= k*Q / (1.75^2)
E(total) = E1 + E2
0 = E1+E2
-E1=E2
Q= (-4.990E10)(1.75^2) / (8.99E9)
Q= -16.9987

I've just learned electrical fields / coulombs law, for a problem like this I just need some explanation on what I'm doing wrong. I thing what the biggest problem is and confusing this is it initially is 2.5m apart but they want you to find it at 1.75m, I'm going to keep working but I feel like the 2.5 is relevant and I'm not using it. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jgs19 said:
Hey I'm a new time member but I hope to use this forum for my college Physics 2 class, anyways:

1. Question: Two charges are D = 2.5 m apart and lie on the x-axis. What must be the magnitude of the charge on the right one, Q2, (in C) so that the electric field is zero at x = 1.75 meters. Let Q1 be at the origin and have a charge 17 C.

2. Equations I'm using.
E(total)=E1+E2...
E=k*q/r^2

3. My attempt:
E1=(8.99E9)(17C) / (1.75^2) = 4.990E10
E2= k*Q / (1.75^2)
E(total) = E1 + E2
0 = E1+E2
-E1=E2
Q= (-4.990E10)(1.75^2) / (8.99E9)
Q= -16.9987

I've just learned electrical fields / coulombs law, for a problem like this I just need some explanation on what I'm doing wrong. I thing what the biggest problem is and confusing this is it initially is 2.5m apart but they want you to find it at 1.75m, I'm going to keep working but I feel like the 2.5 is relevant and I'm not using it. Thanks in advance.
it's quite simple if you understand the concepts...see electric field is a vector, so you should take the direction under consideration before setting the equation,According to data,Q1=+17C, so the field due to it on point(1.75,0) is towards +ve x-axis.So to nulify its effect and make field zero at (1.75,0),Q2 would be -ve and direction of field due to it would be towards -ve x-axis.Now if we only talk about the magnitude,then,...
E1=E2
so, Q1/r1^2=Q2/r2^2
so, 17/(1.75)^2=Q2/(1.25)^2
so, Q2=8.673C.
This was the magnitude that we found.Now, as we discussed earlier, Q2 has to be -ve.So,
Q2=-8.673C.
Hope this was helpful...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top