Electric field (at any point) due to a finite cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field due to a finite cylinder, with participants expressing confusion over the appropriate variables and integration setup. Key points include the need to clarify the role of the azimuthal angle (ϕ) in the integral, as well as the importance of the cylinder's length in the calculations. There is a suggestion to switch the notation from ρ (used for both charge density and radius) to r for clarity. Additionally, it is proposed that working with electric potential first may simplify the problem, as potential does not depend on ϕ. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities involved in integrating over a finite cylinder's geometry.
crazygirl89
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I'm not even attempting the graph yet, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this problem for a finite cylinder. All I've found in my notes is finite spheres and infinite cylinders.


Homework Equations


E=∫[ρdv]/4∏εR2] \hat{R}


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok here's what I've got so far:

E=(1C/(m^3))/(4∏ε) * ∫(ρ,∅,z)/[((1cm)^2)*√(ρ2+∅2+z2)]

Here's a few of my random thoughts on why this isn't done yet:
Is ∅ even needed in the integral? shouldn't ρ and z cover any point inside or outside of the cylinder?
Where the heck does the length l of the cylinder come in?
And finally, the dreaded graph: I think I could figure this one out if ∅ isn't relevant, but if it is, can someone describe how I'd draw that on the graph?


Thanks for all your help/time guys. I searched around on the forums and the net but I could only find people needing help with infinitely ling cylinders or needing the field at a point on the z-axis, not anywhere.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume element in cylindrical coordinates is \rho d\rho d\phi dz and the distance is calculated by d^2=\rho^2+z^2.
 
ok soo..

Ok so this is what I've got now, let me know if I'm understanding you correctly:

E=[(1C/m3)(1cm)] / [4πε(1cm2)] * ∫(ρ,∅,z)/(ρ2+z2) *dρd∅dz

Is that correct? And do I still need the (ρ,∅,z) in the numerator? I guess I'm just confused about whether there should be a ∅ at all in my final equation or not.
 
You don't seem to have posted the original question. (Graph? What graph?).
Is it a uniformly charged solid cylinder?
You seem to have ρ meaning two things: charge density and radius in the XY plane. I suggest switching to r for the latter. The volume element is then, as Shyan posted, rdrdϕdz. You seem to have dropped the initial 'r'.
The field will clearly depend on ϕ. Might be easier to work with the potential first, since that won't depend on ϕ, then differentiate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top