Electric field at point inside a parallel plate capacitor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field within a parallel plate capacitor, focusing on the implications of applying Gauss's Law and the behavior of electric field lines. Participants explore the conditions under which the electric field is considered non-zero despite certain calculations suggesting otherwise.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the electric field inside a parallel plate capacitor is not zero when applying a Gaussian surface, suggesting confusion over the implications of zero flux.
  • Another participant explains that if the plates are approximated as infinite, the electric field lines are uniform and perpendicular to the plates, leading to a constant electric field strength.
  • Some participants clarify that the flux can be zero due to the cancellation of positive and negative contributions from the electric field, even if the electric field itself is not zero.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of the integral of the electric field over an area, with examples provided to illustrate that a zero integral does not imply a zero electric field everywhere.
  • Several participants suggest methods for calculating the electric field, including using Gauss's Law and considering the contributions from individual plates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of zero flux and the nature of the electric field within the capacitor. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the results from Gauss's Law, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the understanding of electric field behavior in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the application of Gauss's Law, particularly regarding the assumptions made about the Gaussian surface and the nature of electric field lines. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and assumptions that are not fully resolved.

Anadi96
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This doubt is nagging in my mind for couple of days,and its makes the rest of the things so dizzy and confusing.Heres what i thought-


What is the electric field at a point inside a parallel plate capacitor?

I thought of this-When i place a guassian surface of ,well maybe any shape,between the parallel plates the electric field lines all pass through it,so net flux should be zero?and if it is zero E should also be zero?

But common sense tell me E can't be a zero,and something is wrong with all the above thinking.What can it be?

Also please explain in clear language,i googled and ended up in i don't know what,then i came here expecting help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you make the approximation that the plates are infinite in size, then the electric field lines in the region between the two plates run perpendicular to the plates (parallel to each other) with constant field strength determined by the charge on the capacitor.

If the two plates aren't infinite in extent, there will be some bending of the field lines due to the edge effects, but this is usually negligible.
 
That i know,that wasn't my question.My question was-What if we draw a Gaussian surface BETWEEN the parallel plate capacitor,Why Electric field isn't zero?Why?
 
Anadi96 said:
That i know,that wasn't my question.My question was-What if we draw a Gaussian surface BETWEEN the parallel plate capacitor,Why Electric field isn't zero?Why?

Welcome to Physics Forums.

There are two ways I can think of to explain why the flux is zero, even if the field isn't:

1. The flux due to field lines entering the surface is equal in magnitude to the flux due to field lines. These two effects cancel each other, resulting in zero total flux.

2. You're apparently familiar with Gauss's Law. Since there is no charge enclosed by the surface, the flux must be zero for the surface -- even if the field is not zero.

Hope that helps.
 
Ok so you just said it.Flux is zero.That means

Integration E.dA is zero!
Area can't be zero so Electric field is zero!But that can't be?How can electric field be zero between a parrallel plate capacitor?
 
that is not it's meaning.notice it is a dot product so it is proportional to cosine of the angle between normal and electric field direction .on one side it is positive and on the other it is negative so flux will become zero.
 
Inte.jpg
 
Anadi96 said:
Ok so you just said it.Flux is zero.That means

Integration E.dA is zero!
Area can't be zero so Electric field is zero!But that can't be?How can electric field be zero between a parrallel plate capacitor?

At some points on the surface {E}\bullet{A} is positive and at other points it's negative. So although E is not zero the integral still comes out zero when the positive and the negative values cancel.
 
Anadi96 said:
Ok so you just said it.Flux is zero.That means

Integration E.dA is zero!
Area can't be zero so Electric field is zero!But that can't be?How can electric field be zero between a parrallel plate capacitor?

Does \int_a^b f(x) =0 where b>a imply that f(x)=0?...Of course not, as a counterexample consider f(x)=\cos \left( \frac{\pi x}{b-a} \right).

Similarily, \oint \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A}=0 does not mean that \mathbf{E} is zero.
 
  • #10
Yes i got that gabbagabbahey and Nugatory,thanks to andrien.I got other question Please look into the pic i posted.
 
  • #11
To prove (there is only one "o" in prove :wink:) that the electric field is not zero, you just need to calculate it. You can do so by applying Gauss' Law with a pillbox that straddles one plate, or by using Coulomb's law, or by solving Laplace's equation for the potential and then taking the negative gradient. There are many places on the internet where the calculation is shown in detail.
 
  • #12
A relatively easy way to calculate what E is would be to apply Gauss's Law to a single, infinite plate of uniform charge density. Symmetry requires that E is the same magnitude on both sides of the plate, and points either directly toward or directly away from the plate.

After doing that, use the superposition principle to add up the fields due to two plates with opposite charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K