Electric field between bands in semiconductors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the electric field between the conduction band (E_c) and the valence band (E_v) in semiconductors, highlighting a common misunderstanding of the semiconductor energy band model. It clarifies that E_c and E_v represent different energy levels rather than spatially separated regions. The correct notation for electric field and energy is emphasized, suggesting using "E" for electric field and "W" for energy. The direction of the electric field is confirmed to be from the conduction band to the valence band, consistent with the movement of charge carriers. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of accurate terminology and concepts in semiconductor physics.
green-fresh
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
i read in an online course about semiconductors that electric field between E_c and E_v
given by:

E=\frac{dE_c}{q dx}

and i know the general form of electric field is :
E=\frac{k.q_0.q}{r^2}
and what is the direction of this field ,i know from positive to negative , from E_c to E_v? because both E_c & E_c have electrons and holes

and dose anyone know what is \mu_n electron mobilities

thank you very much!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
First off be careful with your notation. When using Electric Field and Energy you're best off not to use the symbol "E" for both. Consider using "E" for electric field and "W" for work or energy.

Second and more important, you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the semiconductor energy band model. The conduction and valence bands represent different energy levels in the semiconductor, they are not spatially separated.
 
yes! I'm sorry you are right
could i have an electric field between negative charge and positive charge even if there isn't a space between them .
and is it correct that:
the direction of this field is,i know from positive to negative , from CB(conduction band) to VB ?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top