Electric Field Direction at 14.1 cm from a Charged Cylinder and Conducting Shell

AI Thread Summary
At 14.1 cm from the central axis of a charged cylinder and conducting shell, the electric field direction is a key point of confusion. Initially, it was assumed that the field points radially outward, but this was deemed incorrect. Clarification revealed that 14.1 cm is indeed outside the conducting shell, which has a radius of 8 cm. If the conducting shell has no net charge, the electric field beyond it does point radially outward. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the problem's dimensions and charge distribution.
SpringWater
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A long non-conducting cylinder has a charge density ρ = αr, where α = 6.34 C/m4 and r is in meters. Concentric around it is a hollow metallic cylindrical shell.

Diameter 1: 4.36 cm
Diameter 2: 10.4 cm
Diameter 3: 16 cm

What is the direction of the electric field at 14.1 cm from the central axis.

1. Points Radically Outward
2. Points radically Inward
3. Undetermined, since the firld is zero
4. The electric field is not a vector and therefore has no direction

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Soo...since the question stated 14.1 cm from the central axis. this is outside of the cylinder. the electric field exists? so it would be pointing radically outward?

I choose radically outward

this is incorrect!
So at this point I am unable to come up with a reason why it is not pointing radically outward?

My next assumption is that it would be pointing in the x-axis however that is not an option, and i am unsure how to relate it to the other three options. any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you

 

Attachments

  • 20130302_210153.jpg
    20130302_210153.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 854
Physics news on Phys.org
SpringWater said:

Homework Statement


A long non-conducting cylinder has a charge density ρ = αr, where α = 6.34 C/m4 and r is in meters. Concentric around it is a hollow metallic cylindrical shell.

Diameter 1: 4.36 cm
Diameter 2: 10.4 cm
Diameter 3: 16 cm

What is the direction of the electric field at 14.1 cm from the central axis.

1. Points Radically Outward
2. Points radically Inward
3. Undetermined, since the firld is zero
4. The electric field is not a vector and therefore has no direction

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Soo...since the question stated 14.1 cm from the central axis. this is outside of the cylinder. the electric field exists? so it would be pointing radically outward?

I choose radically outward

this is incorrect!
So at this point I am unable to come up with a reason why it is not pointing radically outward?

My next assumption is that it would be pointing in the x-axis however that is not an option, and i am unsure how to relate it to the other three options. any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Look again at the location, 14.1 cm from the axis. Isn't that location within the conducting material of the cylindrical shell ?
 
SammyS said:
Look again at the location, 14.1 cm from the axis. Isn't that location within the conducting material of the cylindrical shell ?

The outer diameter is 16 cm. Wouldnt that mean the radius is 8cm. So 14cm is on the outside and not on the inside...unless the question is phrased incorrectly as in, 14 cm is the diameter of and 7 is the radius. But i do not think that is the case.
 
SpringWater said:
The outer diameter is 16 cm. Wouldnt that mean the radius is 8cm. So 14cm is on the outside and not on the inside...unless the question is phrased incorrectly as in, 14 cm is the diameter of and 7 is the radius. But i do not think that is the case.
You're right. I was thinking of those as radii, even though you clearly said they're diameters.

If the conducing shell has no net charge, the field beyond the shell points radially outward. -- You were correct.
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
You're right. I was thinking of those as radii, even though you clearly said they're diameters.

If the conducing shell has no net charge, the field beyond the shell points radially outward. -- You were correct.

Thank you for your help. You confirmed that the diagram provided is incorrect. The diameter was actually suppose to be labeled as radius…
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top