Electric Field due to Continuous Line Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field above the midpoint of a uniformly charged line segment. Two equations for the electric field are presented, highlighting the relationship between the distance and the unit vector. The integration setup involves understanding the contributions of each charge along the line, particularly how the angle affects the vertical component of the electric field. The importance of the cosine factor in determining the z-component of the electric field is emphasized, clarifying that the total field is not simply the vertical component. Overall, the conversation aids in grasping the nuances of electric field calculations for continuous charge distributions.
darkpsi
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the electric field a distance z above the midpoint of a straight line segment of length
2L, which carries a uniform line charge λ.


Homework Equations


1) my textbook says :
E(r) = 1/4πεoV λ(r')/r2 r dl'


2) and this also works? :
E(r) = 1/4πεoV λ(r')/r3 r dl'

both where r is the unit vector from the charge to the point we are caluclating the field at


The Attempt at a Solution


I can integrate once I get the setup down just fine. I just wanted to know when and why this two are the same. For example, in my book it says for the setup for this problem :
E(r) = 2 * 1/4πεoV(λdx/r2)cosθz

For one thing, how did that cos appear and since it equals z/r couldn't 2) have just been used from the start? And if 2) can be used could I apply it to surface and volume integrals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General formula for E is:

dE = 1/4πεo (dq/r^2)\hat{r}

However, r = r.\hat{r} (r_hat is unit vector)
So you can write"

dE = 1/4πεo (dq/r^3).r

--
Electric field of a point above distance Z from a line is a cumulative Electric field caused by every charge in straight line.

Lets say an angle formed by E caused by one charge and a vertical axis is theta. From there, you can get:
E_x = E * sin(theta)
E_y = E * cos(theta)

And because E in x-axis will automatically blow up, you just need to find E in y-axis.

Hope this helps
 
Oh now I see. I wasn't even thinking that because r_hat wasn't pointing vertically that the z component wasn't all of the electric field. I was thinking the x-fields canceled so the field in the z direction was exactly equal to the electric field, but its actually only cos(theta) of it. Thanks a bunch
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top