Electric field due to two positive charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field due to two positive charges and determining the charge value, Q. The original formula used for the electric field was incorrect for the scenario, as it was derived from a dipole situation where charges are of opposite signs. Participants emphasized the importance of vector components, noting that in this case, the horizontal components of the electric fields cancel while the vertical components add. The correct approach involves recalculating the electric field using the appropriate formula for two identical positive charges. Ultimately, understanding the symmetry and vector nature of electric fields is crucial for accurate calculations.
sebah
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble solving the following problem. I am given two positive charges on the x axis:

Problemphysicsforums.JPG


I know that the electric field strength at point P is ##E=150 \frac{V}{m}##, ##d=1.8m## and ##a=2.5m##. I want to find the charge of ##Q##. As far as I know, the electric field on the y-axis between the two charges is given by:

$$E=\frac{2xQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (x^2+y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

where ##x## is the distance between one charge and the origin and ##y## is the distance from the origin on the ##y##-axis. In this case ##y=d## and ##x=\frac{a}{2}##.

$$E=\frac{aQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 ((\frac{a}{2})^2+d^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

Solving for ##Q##:

$$Q=\frac{E 4 \pi \epsilon_0 ((\frac{a}{2})^2+d^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{a}$$

Plugging in values gives me:

$$Q=7.02 \cdot 10^{-8} C=70nC$$

The correct answer is supposed to be ##~50nC=50\cdot 10^{-9}C##. Am I doing something wrong or is there a mistake in the solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does your value for E make sense in the limit x=0??
 
hutchphd said:
Does your value for E make sense in the limit x=0??

Not really I think. If x=0 which means that the distance between the charges goes to zero (a=0) I get E=0. Not sure why I am getting zero here though. Should be something like the electric field of 2Q at the origin.
 
If I were doing it, I would just do the vector sum of field from each charge. What is the net vector at point P?
 
sebah said:
Not really I think. If x=0 which means that the distance between the charges goes to zero (a=0) I get E=0. Not sure why I am getting zero here though. Should be something like the electric field of 2Q at the origin.
Where did you get the formula? Its wrong.
 
scottdave said:
If I were doing it, I would just do the vector sum of field from each charge. What is the net vector at point P?

That's exactly what I did. My formula looks just like the one derived by R. Shankar in his yale physics course. LINK
 
hutchphd said:
Where did you get the formula? Its wrong.

Like I mentioned in the other reply I got the formula from R. Shankar and his yale course. LINK
 
In the lecture, he is calculating the field of a dipole where one charge is positive and one is negative. The y-components cancel out and the x-components add.

That's not the case here. Draw the vectors representing the fields from those two identical positive charges. They do not cancel out in the same way as the fields in your link.

Moral: Don't take formulas blindly from one situation and apply them to a totally different situation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sebah
RPinPA said:
In the lecture, he is calculating the field of a dipole where one charge is positive and one is negative. The y-components cancel out and the x-components add.

That's not the case here. Draw the vectors representing the fields from those two identical positive charges. They do not cancel out in the same way as the fields in your link.

Moral: Don't take formulas blindly from one situation and apply them to a totally different situation.

Oh I see. In my case the horizontal components cancel and the vertical components add. I will then get:

$$E=\frac{2*y*Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (x^2+y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$
 
  • #10
Hint: an electric field is a vector!
 
  • #11
Incidentally, you should be able to write down the electric field from point charges from first principles. In fact the easy way to do this is to notice the symmetry, write down the electric (scalar) potential and take the derivative d/dy to get the field in that direction. But any correct way is OK.
 
Back
Top