Electric field/equipotential field questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter t_n_p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Field
AI Thread Summary
Equipotential lines and electric field lines in a parallel plate capacitor are discussed, emphasizing that equipotential surfaces are always perpendicular to field lines. The potential difference between the plates is given as 10V, with calculations suggesting an electric field strength of 500V/m at a distance of 0.02m from the second plate. The importance of sketching the electric field direction, which curves to maintain right angles with equipotential lines, is highlighted. The discussion includes visual representations to aid understanding. Overall, the relationship between electric fields and equipotential lines is clarified through calculations and sketches.
t_n_p
Messages
593
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

1. Sketch the equipotential lines and field lines between a parallel plate capacotor assumed to have infinite plate area.

2. If the distance between the plates is 0.1m, the potential of one plate is 0V and the potential of the second plate is 10V, what is the potential at a point 0.02m from the second plate?

The attempt at a solution

1. I'm pretty sure field lines would just be from one of the plates to the other, but I'm not sure about the equipotential lines.

2. Not sure how to do this one!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Equipotential surfaces are always perpendicular to field lines.

2) \displaystyle \Delta V = E\cdot \Delta x (for a uniform electric field)
 
1. something like this? (solid = field, dashed = equipotential)

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/3261/untitledwz6.png

2. 10 = E*0.02
E = 500V/m?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, except equipotential lines are continuous.
 
cool, I've got one more question

For this one, I need to sketch the direction of the electric field. I know they have to be perpendicular to the equipotential lines drawn, so I'm guessing its going to sort of curve slightly to make a right angle with each of the equipotential lines like such?

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/761/img0328aiu1lf4.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top