Electric Field: Find Distance z Above Line Segment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a distance z above one end of a uniformly charged line segment of length L. The formula used involves integrating the contributions from differential charge elements, leading to the expression de=1/4πε₀ (dQ/r²) cos(θ). A key point of confusion is whether to include the cosine term, which is necessary when considering the electric field's components at the center of the rod, but not when calculating the field at one end. The conversation highlights differences in solutions found in various resources, with one participant clarifying that they were calculating the magnitude of the electric field rather than its components. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for correctly setting up and solving the physics problem.
leonne
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the electric field distance z above one end of the straight line segment of length L which carrys uniform charge


Homework Equations


de=1/4pie Eo (Q/r^2) r^

The Attempt at a Solution



This was an example in a book and have few questions about it what they did was

using that formula de=1/4pie Eo (dQ/r^2) cos@
then plugs in, de=1/4pie Eo (y dx/(z^2+x^2) ) (z/(z^2+x^2)^1/2 y is the uniform charge.
My question is why did they do this as in how did they figure out r^2= (z^2+x^2) that dq= ydx and that r^ = cos@

I am bad at setting up the physics problem, i have no problem after everything is set up to solve it.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi leon

since you are trying to find the electric field at one end of the rod, you don't need to use
\cos{\theta} in the formula. since you are presenting the solution from the book,are you sure they are finding the electric field at one end and not at the center of the
rod ? if author is trying to find the electric field at the center of the rod, distance z above it,
then having \cos{\theta} there makes sense , since in that case we only count
the component of the electric field away from the rod...
 
Hey well actually it was a problem and found the solution on crampster, but after looking at the solution in the solution manual they have different answer, but they both use the cos ( maybe on crampster they simplified the final answer or something looks like they solved it same way)
well here's the step by step on what they did (idk if u have an account or not)
http://www.cramster.com/solution/solution/178791
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi

i see what's happening... i did calculation for the magnitude of E and they are doing calculations for the horizontal and vertical component of the E.. while calculating the components you will need to use cos and sin...but if you are just interested in the magnitude then you can do like I say...
 
o ok thxs
 
good luck
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top