Electric field from a line of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field produced by a uniformly charged rod with a positive charge of 7.81 pC and a length of 14.5 cm at a point 6.00 cm away along its perpendicular bisector. The participant attempts to derive the electric field using the equation dE = (kdQ)/r^2 and sets up an integral to find the total electric field. They express the charge density and integrate over the length of the rod but express uncertainty about the setup of the integral. A key point raised is that only the x-components of the electric field need to be considered due to symmetry, as the y-components will cancel out. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the integral to find the desired electric field.
midge
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Positive charge q= 7.81pC is spread uniformly along a thin nonconducting rod of length L=14.5cm. What are the magnitude and direction (relative to the direction of the x axis) of the E-field produce at pt P, at distance R = 6.00 cm from the rod along its perpendicular bisector.

Homework Equations



dE= (kdQ)/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



dQ = charge density (a) * dL --> dE = intergral from -L/2 to L/2 of (k*a*dL)/(R^2 + L^2/4)
E= k*a/ (R^2 + L^2/4) * L ---> charge density (a)= Q/L
E = kQ/(R^2 + L^2/4)

It might be a bit hard to understand all the broken notations. Sorry. I also tried to attached a diagram, please look at that to clarify. I don't think I set up the integral correctly. Help please! Thanks
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the line of charge is vertical, you only need to consider the x-components of the force; the y-components will cancel out. Why? Symmetry.

Can you find an expression for the x-component of the force?

If so, just integrate that over the integration region and you'll have your answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top