Electric field from a non-uniformly charged disk

mshahi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are given a disk with negligible thickness, a radius of 1m, and a surface charge density of σ(x,y) = 1 + cos(π√x2+y2). The disk is centered at the origin of the xy plane. We are also given the location of a point charge in Cartesian coordinates, for example [0.5,0.5,2]. We need to find the electric field components (x,y,z) at the location of the point charge.

Homework Equations


d##\vec E## = σdS/4πε0 ⋅ ##\hat r##/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


My first thought was to make dS a thin ring centre origin. this would give dS=2πr'dr' where r' is the radius from the origin to the ring. I then thought the I could write r2 as r'2+z2, and r' would also be equal to √x2+y2. Plugging this and σ into the integral just to find the magnitude of ##\vec E## we get:
∫ (1+cos(πr'))r'/(r'2+z2) dr'
However I have realized that this is wrong because a) the answer it gives is far to small to be reasonable, b) I think this calculation assumes a spherical field which it clearly isn't, and c) the relationship to find r in terms of r' and z only holds if the point charge is over the disk, which it isn't necessarily. I think I am meant to split the integral into x, y, and z components but am unsure of whether this is the correct approach. Now i am completely stuck, none of the notes I can find explain this, I even took out a book from the 1950s on electrostatics to try and find the way to solve this and I just cannot for the life of me find it anywhere! Any help would be very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello mshahi, :welcome:

Are you aware that the ##\vec r## in ##d\vec E## is a different one from the ## r ## in ##dS## ? How ? Writing ##r^2## as ##r'\,^2 + z^2 ## makes ##x## and ##y## disappear. Or are you only interested in the field on the z axis ?

Make a drawing to oversee the situation and set up an expression for the integration.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top