Electric Field from Permanent Magnet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a permanently magnetized slab and a spinning magnetized sphere. The slab has a uniform magnetization \textbf{M} = (0, M, 0) and thickness d, while the sphere has a uniform magnetization \textbf{M} = (0, 0, M) and radius r. The key equations discussed include the surface magnetic charge density \sigma_{m, n} = \textbf{M} \cdot \textbf{n} and the volume magnetic charge density \rho_{m} = - \nabla \cdot \textbf{M}. The solution approach involves using duality transformations from Griffiths' Electrodynamics to relate electric and magnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations and their applications.
  • Familiarity with magnetic charge density and surface current concepts.
  • Knowledge of Griffiths' Electrodynamics, particularly duality transformations.
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism, including electric and magnetic fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' Electrodynamics, focusing on duality transformations and their implications.
  • Learn about the derivation and applications of magnetic charge density and surface current.
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and polarization in magnetized materials.
  • Investigate advanced topics in electromagnetism, such as the implications of moving magnetic fields on electric fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as educators looking for insights into teaching concepts related to magnetic fields and electric fields generated by magnetized materials.

insomniac392
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've been extremely stuck on the following problems and was hoping someone could give me a push in the right direction:

Homework Statement



1) Given an infinite slab of permanently magnetized matter of thickness d centered on the xy-plane with uniform magnetization [tex]\textbf{M} = (0, M, 0)[/tex] and velocity [tex]\textbf{v} = (v, 0, 0)[/tex], find the electric field at [tex]\textbf{E}(0, 0, 0)[/tex] and [tex]\textbf{E}(0, y, 0)[/tex] where y > d.

2) A magnetized sphere with uniform magnetization [tex]\textbf{M} = (0, 0, M)[/tex] and radius r is spinning at a rate of [tex]\textbf{\omega} = (0, 0, \omega)[/tex]. Find the electric field for r' > r. (Hint: Find the equivalent magnetic charge density, [tex]\rho_m[/tex], and equivalent surface current, [tex]\sigma_m[/tex].)

Homework Equations



I'm not entirely sure (hence the thread)!

[tex]\sigma_{m, n} = \textbf{M} \cdot \textbf{n}[/tex]

[tex]\rho_{m} = - \nabla \cdot \textbf{M}[/tex]

...these are factors of the integrand that give rise to the magnetic scalar potential, [tex]\Omega[/tex], which in turn yields [tex]\textbf{B}[/tex] via [tex]\textbf{H} = - \nabla \Omega[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm desperately stuck on these; for both problems I can find [tex]\rho_m[/tex] and [tex]\sigma_m[/tex], but I don't see the connection to the [tex]\textbf{E}[/tex]-field. Any suggestions to get me started would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
insomniac392 said:
Hello,

I've been extremely stuck on the following problems and was hoping someone could give me a push in the right direction:

Homework Statement



1) Given an infinite slab of permanently magnetized matter of thickness d centered on the xy-plane with uniform magnetization [tex]\textbf{M} = (0, M, 0)[/tex] and velocity [tex]\textbf{v} = (v, 0, 0)[/tex], find the electric field at [tex]\textbf{E}(0, 0, 0)[/tex] and [tex]\textbf{E}(0, y, 0)[/tex] where y > d.

2) A magnetized sphere with uniform magnetization [tex]\textbf{M} = (0, 0, M)[/tex] and radius r is spinning at a rate of [tex]\textbf{\omega} = (0, 0, \omega)[/tex]. Find the electric field for r' > r. (Hint: Find the equivalent magnetic charge density, [tex]\rho_m[/tex], and equivalent surface current, [tex]\sigma_m[/tex].)

Homework Equations



I'm not entirely sure (hence the thread)!

[tex]\sigma_{m, n} = \textbf{M} \cdot \textbf{n}[/tex]

[tex]\rho_{m} = - \nabla \cdot \textbf{M}[/tex]

...these are factors of the integrand that give rise to the magnetic scalar potential, [tex]\Omega[/tex], which in turn yields [tex]\textbf{B}[/tex] via [tex]\textbf{H} = - \nabla \Omega[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm desperately stuck on these; for both problems I can find [tex]\rho_m[/tex] and [tex]\sigma_m[/tex], but I don't see the connection to the [tex]\textbf{E}[/tex]-field. Any suggestions to get me started would be greatly appreciated.

Well, after doing some digging I found the following problem (7.60) in Griffiths' Electrodynamics:

Maxwell's equations are invariant under the following duality transformations

[tex]\textbf{E'} = \textbf{E} cos(\alpha) + c \textbf{B} sin(\alpha)[/tex]

[tex]c \textbf{B'} = c \textbf{B} cos(\alpha) - \textbf{E} sin(\alpha)[/tex]

[tex]c q_{e}' = c q_{e} cos(\alpha) + q_{m} sin(\alpha)[/tex]

[tex]q_{m}' = q_{m} cos(\alpha) - c q_{e} sin(\alpha)[/tex]

...where [tex]c = 1/\sqrt{\epsilon_0 \mu_0}[/tex], [tex]q_m[/tex] is the magnetic charge and [tex]\alpha[/tex] is an arbitrary rotation angle in "[tex]\textbf{E}-\textbf{B}[/tex] space."

Griffiths' says that, "this means, in particular, that if you know the fields produced by a configuration of electric charge, you can immediately (using [tex]\alpha = \pi / 2[/tex]) write down the fields produced by the corresponding arrangement of magnetic charge."

Thus, if I were to solve for [tex]\textbf{E}[/tex] in (1) and (2) with a polarization [tex]\textbf{P}[/tex] instead of a magnetization [tex]\textbf{M}[/tex], I could then use a duality transformation to find the solutions to (1) and (2), correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K