Electric field in an electrostatic precipitator.

AI Thread Summary
Electrostatic precipitators effectively remove pollutants from smoke using electric forces, particularly in coal-burning power plants. A specific design involves a vertical hollow cylinder with a thin wire at a lower potential, creating a strong inward radial electric field. The discussion highlights the calculation of the electric field's magnitude midway between the wire and cylinder wall, revealing that the electric field is not constant due to the radial nature of the field. The correct approach involves recognizing that the electric field decreases with radius, leading to a final calculated value of approximately 96070.57 V/m for part A. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the charge required to exert a specific force on particles within the precipitator.
MSZShadow
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electrostatic precipitators use electric forces to remove pollutant particles from smoke, in particular in the smokestacks of coal-burning power plants. One form of precipitator consists of a vertical, hollow, metal cylinder with a thin wire, insulated from the cylinder, running along its axis . A large potential difference is established between the wire and the outer cylinder, with the wire at lower potential. This sets up a strong radial electric field directed inward. The field produces a region of ionized air near the wire. Smoke enters the precipitator at the bottom, ash and dust in it pick up electrons, and the charged pollutants are accelerated toward the outer cylinder wall by the electric field. Suppose the radius of the central wire is 83*10^(-6) m, the radius of the cylinder is 14.0 cm, and a potential difference of 50.0 kV is established between the wire and the cylinder. Also assume that the wire and cylinder are both very long in comparison to the cylinder radius.

A) What is the magnitude of the electric field midway between the wire and the cylinder wall?

B) What magnitude of charge must a 34.5*10^(-6) g ash particle have if the electric field computed in part (A) is to exert a force ten times the weight of the particle?

Homework Equations


V_a - V_b = \int^{r_b}_{r_a}Edl
F_{elec}=qE

The Attempt at a Solution


The first thing I recognized is that since V is directly proportional to l, if the distance l is halved, so will the potential V. So the V from a to b should be
V_{ab}=\frac{50*10^3}{2}=25*10^3

Then I took the integral
V_a-V_b=\int^{r_b}_{r_a}Edl=E(l)^{r_b}_{r_a}=E(r_b-r_a)

Then I solved for the magnitude of E at the specified point.
|E|=\frac{V_{ab}}{r_b-r_a}=\frac{25*10^3\ V}{(\frac{14*10^{-2}\ m-83*10^{-6}\ m}{2})-0\ m}=357354.7174\ \frac{V}{m}

Of course, this is wrong. Where did I make a mistake, and how should I have done the problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you have assumed E is constant along the radius of the cylinder. I see others agree
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100219162818AA3lXpY

but I don't understand that. The electric field lines spread out radially and are further apart at the outside than at the inside. It seems to me that means the electric field decreases with radius and therefore your integration is incorrect. Gauss' Law indicates the E field is proportional to 1/r.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elecyl.html#c2
You could integrate with E = C/r to get the C related to the potential difference and then you would know E as a function of r.
 
Ah. You're right. E wouldn't be constant...
That would mean that the graph of V against l wouldn't be linear as well...

Alright. I'll see where I can get with that. Starting with solving for the linear density...
...
Alright. Got it. The answer to part A is 96070.57423 V/m. Thanks. :)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top