Electric field in insulating slab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at a point within a uniformly charged insulating slab using Gauss' Law. The slab measures 2 m x 2 m x 5 mm and has a total charge of 2 x 10^{-10} C. The user correctly identifies two Gaussian surfaces to determine the electric field at point P, located 0.5 mm from the top face. The calculations yield a net electric field of 2.26 N/C, which is confirmed as correct, with a minor note that the Gaussian surfaces should be referred to as pillboxes rather than cylinders. The final answer of 2.26 N/C is validated.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
A large, thin, insulating slab 2 m x 2 m x 5 mm has a charge of 2 x 10^{-10} C distributed uniformly throughout its volume. determine the electric field at observation point P, which is located within the slab, beneath its centre, 0.5 mm from the top face.

udI1k.png


I started off by making two Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders. The first ranges from the bottom of the slab to point P. The second ranges from point P to the top of the slab. I then calculated the net electric field on point P due to the electric fields traveling out of the ends of the two Gaussian surfaces, using Gauss' Law.

E = E_{1} - E_{2} = \frac{Q_{1}}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{Q_{2}}{2A\epsilon_{o}}

where E is the net electric field acting on point P, E_{1} is the electric field from the first Gaussian surface, and E_{2} is the electric field from the second Gaussian surface.

The charge density is as follows:

\rho = Q/V = 2\cdot 10^{-10}/(2\cdot2\cdot0.005) = 1\cdot10^{-8}

Q_{1}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0045 = 4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A

Q_{2}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0005 = 5\cdot 10^{-12}A

E = \frac{4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{5\cdot 10^{-12}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}}

E = 2.26 N/C

My final answer is 2.26 N/C. Is my process correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
temaire said:
A large, thin, insulating slab 2 m x 2 m x 5 mm has a charge of 2 x 10^{-10} C distributed uniformly throughout its volume. determine the electric field at observation point P, which is located within the slab, beneath its centre, 0.5 mm from the top face.

udI1k.png


I started off by making two Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders. The first ranges from the bottom of the slab to point P. The second ranges from point P to the top of the slab. I then calculated the net electric field on point P due to the electric fields traveling out of the ends of the two Gaussian surfaces, using Gauss' Law.

E = E_{1} - E_{2} = \frac{Q_{1}}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{Q_{2}}{2A\epsilon_{o}}

where E is the net electric field acting on point P, E_{1} is the electric field from the first Gaussian surface, and E_{2} is the electric field from the second Gaussian surface.

The charge density is as follows:

\rho = Q/V = 2\cdot 10^{-10}/(2\cdot2\cdot0.005) = 1\cdot10^{-8}

Q_{1}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0045 = 4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A

Q_{2}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0005 = 5\cdot 10^{-12}A

E = \frac{4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{5\cdot 10^{-12}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}}

E = 2.26 N/C

My final answer is 2.26 N/C. Is my process correct?
That looks correct to me. :approve:

Oh, except for one thing. You said, "Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders." I think you meant pillboxes. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top