Electric field inside a slab of with constant charge density.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field inside a slab with constant charge density. Participants express uncertainty about whether the charge is uniformly distributed and debate the appropriateness of using a sphere versus a cylinder for the Gaussian surface. They agree that due to symmetry, the electric field component along the curved side of the cylinder should be zero, as any non-zero field would disrupt the symmetry of the problem. The conversation highlights the complexity of solving the problem mathematically while emphasizing the value of intuitive explanations for undergraduate physics students. Overall, the consensus is that symmetry plays a crucial role in determining the electric field in this scenario.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have attached the question in a picture. I also attached a picture a drew as my attempt at understanding the question.


Homework Equations


flux = EA = Qenclo


The Attempt at a Solution


So I am not sure how to interpret this question. Is the charge distributed uniformly? If it is then it can be very difficult to solve as you can see in my diagram the electric field goes every where.

Instead of a cylinder I was thinking of using a sphere as my surface... Does that even make sense?


Here is an answer I found online:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100124155001AAmSOpU

Do you guys agree? I notice the solution only used the top and bottom area of the gaussian surface...
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    18.1 KB · Views: 619
  • photo (7).JPG
    photo (7).JPG
    23.1 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org
usually, the slab is taken to be infinitely (or at least, very) wide in the x and y planes. So using symmetry, what do you think would be the electric field component in the direction of the cylinder's curved side?
 
BruceW said:
usually, the slab is taken to be infinitely (or at least, very) wide in the x and y planes. So using symmetry, what do you think would be the electric field component in the direction of the cylinder's curved side?

It seems like it should be zero, if it isn't it's extremely difficult to solve... But I don't know why...?
 
Yeah, its zero. When I was doing undergraduate physics, the explanation they offered was that due to symmetry, it will be zero. If you think about the situation, it would be hard to imagine how the electric field in this direction would be non-zero, while still keeping the symmetry of the problem.

I guess to do this problem properly, you could use rigorous mathematical arguments about symmetry groups. But that is stuff beyond most physics undergraduates, so an intuitive explanation is OK.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top