Electric field inside at points on a conductive box

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at three points related to a conducting box with excess negative charge. Point a, located outside the box, yields a calculated electric field of approximately -379.7 N/C, but confusion arises regarding why the answer is expected to be positive despite the negative charge. Point b, situated within the thick wall of the box, results in an electric field of 0 N/C, as does point c, which is located inside the cavity. The reasoning highlights that the electric field inside the conductor is zero due to the shielding effect of the charges on the surface. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the distribution of charges and the implications of Gauss' Law in determining electric fields in different regions.
Caiti
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm having trouble understanding a concept.
Given a conducting box with point a located outside the box, point b located within the (thick) wall of the box and point c located within the cavity of the box, I have to calculate the electric field at each of these points.
There is excess negative charge on the box and a surface density of 2.10×10^10 e/m^2.

I managed to figure out all parts, but I struggle to understand why this is the case.


Homework Equations


Gauss' Law: ∫ E.dA = Q/ε_0
Q = Ne


The Attempt at a Solution



For point a:
Q = Ne ∴ Q = 1.6*10^(-19)*-2.10*10^(10) = 3.36*10^-9

∫E.dA = Q/ε_0 = (3.36*10^-9)/(8.85*10^-12) ≈ -379.7 N/C

I know the answer is meant to be positive, but I don't understand how. I believed it would be negative as the charge on the box is negative, and so would 'emit' a negative field.

For point b:
0 N/C because it is inside the walls of the box.

For point c:
I initially thought this would be (+ or -) 379.7 N/C to balance out point a, but found the answer to be 0 N/C. I can't find a reason why this would be, other than that the net charge must be negative; however, I don't see why this couldn't contribute a negative charge in order to increase the magnitude of the net negative charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For point a, I don't understand exactly what is your question.

For point c think the following. Where are the charges? Are there charges INSIDE the box? The electrical field inside the box is related to the electric charge that is inside the box. Another way to see this is the following. In point b there is no field, so the outside fields become zero in this point, what do you expect to happen as you go to the interior?
 
phpnwW18d.png


Here's a copy of an image explaining where the points are. It has them labelled as 1, 2 and 3, but I used a, b and c respectively.

So with point c, inside, it is determined by point b? I'm sorry, but I don't fully understand

Thank you (=
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top