Electric field inside charged conducting sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field inside a charged conducting sphere is zero due to electrostatic equilibrium, despite the intuitive reasoning from point charges. When considering two point charges on opposite sides, the field cancels at the midpoint, but this logic fails for points closer to one charge. The resolution lies in recognizing that the distribution of charges on the sphere results in a balance of electric fields, with more distant charges having a greater influence. A brute-force calculation or integration demonstrates this balance, reinforcing Gauss' Law. Ultimately, the net electric field inside the sphere remains zero regardless of external charge configurations.
mohamed el teir
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
i know it s zero because of the electrostatic equilibrium, but in terms of point charges : from the charge distribution on the sphere surface if we consider 2 point charges opposite to each other in direction : it s logical that at the point in the mid distance between them the electric field will be zero : (kq1/r1^2)=(kq2/r2^2) where q1=q2 and r1=r2, but if we consider a point closer to a point charge than the other charge : q1=q2 also but r1 not equal r2, therefore it s logical that there will be net field at this point, but there is no field at any point inside the sphere, so what is the solution of this contradictory ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not just about those two point charges.
A brute-force calculation might help... after which one might have more appreciation for Gauss' Law.
 
Very very crudely (I hate to do this) it's because for a point off-centre there are more point charges on the sphere further away than there are closer - the effect balances out exactly when you add them all up. Surely any E&M textbook shows how to do the integration.
 
DaPi said:
Very very crudely (I hate to do this) it's because for a point off-centre there are more point charges on the sphere further away than there are closer - the effect balances out exactly when you add them all up. Surely any E&M textbook shows how to do the integration.
nailed it ! thanks man ...
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top