Electric field inside conductor

AI Thread Summary
In a spherical conducting shell with a central point charge +Q, the electric field behaves differently at various radii. Inside the shell (r < a), the electric field is due to the point charge and is non-zero. Between the inner and outer surfaces of the conductor (a < r < b), the electric field is zero because the induced charges on the inner and outer surfaces cancel each other out. Outside the shell (r > b), the electric field is directed outward due to the positive charge on the outer surface. The conductor's property ensures that any internal electric field is neutralized, maintaining a zero field within its material.
bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spherical conducting shell of inner radius a and outer radius b contains a centrally-located point charge +Q. Is an electric field present at radii (i) less than a, (ii) between a and b, and (iii) greater than b?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook says the electric field inside a conductor (a<r<b here) is zero, but I can't understand why. In (i), the field is that due to the charge. In (iii), field lines emanate from the surface at right angles (because the induced charge is positive on the outer surface).

In (ii), it seems like the field should be non-zero because of the induced positive charge on the outer surface and the induced negative charge on the inner surface. Wouldn't this create an electric field directed radially inward from r=b to r=a? The textbook says it's zero.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigplanet401 said:

Homework Statement



A spherical conducting shell of inner radius a and outer radius b contains a centrally-located point charge +Q. Is an electric field present at radii (i) less than a, (ii) between a and b, and (iii) greater than b?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook says the electric field inside a conductor (a<r<b here) is zero, but I can't understand why. In (i), the field is that due to the charge. In (iii), field lines emanate from the surface at right angles (because the induced charge is positive on the outer surface).

In (ii), it seems like the field should be non-zero because of the induced positive charge on the outer surface and the induced negative charge on the inner surface. Wouldn't this create an electric field directed radially inward from r=b to r=a? The textbook says it's zero.

Thanks for your help!

Yes, the induced negative charge on the inner surface and the induced positive charge on the outer surface create a radially inward electric field that is just enough to cancel the radially outward electric field from the central point charge in this region a < r < b.

The point of an ideal conductor is that it can be considered a sort of limitless source of free charge. So, the E-field from the central point charge pushes charges around inside the conductor until they are arranged in such as way as to cancel out the field. If the field were not canceled out, and there were still a NET electric field inside the conductor, then this net electric field would push around even MORE charges until the arrangement was such that the field inside the conductor was zero.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top