Electric Field of extended mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the origin due to a semicircular wire composed of two quarter-circle segments with charges +Q and -Q, where Q is 5.33 nC and the radius R is 15.9 cm. The initial approach incorrectly integrated from 0 to π instead of the correct limits of 0 to π/2. The correct expression for the electric field is derived using the formula E = Q/(π²ε₀R²), resulting in a value of 2413 N/C in the x-direction. The final conclusion confirms that the earlier calculation error stemmed from miscalculating the integration limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Proficiency in using the formula for electric fields from continuous charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions using integration
  • Learn about vector calculus in the context of electric fields
  • Explore the concept of charge density and its application in electrostatics
  • Investigate the effects of different charge configurations on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and electric field calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Redoctober
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
So here is the scenario (see attachment) - I have a semicircle wire (radius R=15.9cm) which is made of insulator material , the semicircle consist of two combined quartercircle wires parts where one has equally distributed charge +Q and the other has -Q . Required is find the Electric field in direction of x at the origin . Q=5.33nC

My approach was as follows

Let E = 1/(4*pi*e)∫1/(R^2).dQ r

dQ=λ*ds and ds=R*dθ and i also know that unit vector r = cosθ*i+sinθ*j

therefore for the E in x direction i get this expression

E = 1/(4*pi*e)*1/(R^2)*λ*R∫cosθ.dθ

Integrating from 0 to pi ( thus taking only half of the semicircle ) and using λ as 2/(pi*r)

I get Q/(2*pi^2*e*R^2) .
Because the other half has opposite charge i can say that the Etot = Eneg +Epos

Therefore i multiply the equation by two to finaly get

Q/(pi^2*e*R^2)

If i put the values given i get as absolute value 2413 N/C for Electric field at origin of circel in the direction of x

Unfortunately it is a wrong solution :( ! What is the mistake i hv done ?? Can anyone spot it ? Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Picture.png
    Picture.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Redoctober! :smile:
Redoctober said:
Integrating from 0 to pi ( thus taking only half of the semicircle ) …

noooo :cry:

0 to π/2 :redface:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Redoctober! :smile:


noooo :cry:

0 to π/2 :redface:

Oh ! srrry typo error :S :S , i integrated from 0 to pi/2 .
The answer 2413 N/C is wrong :/ !
 
Anyone has a solution ?? :/ !
 
The E field for the right part of your semi circle is given by
E = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{-Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} d\theta
While the E field for the left part is the same but with +Q charge and integrated from \frac{\pi}{2} to \pi. Just add these two together to get the total field.
 
Are you sure? An electric field is a vector, and the correct formula is

\vec{E}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \rho(\vec{x}') \frac{\vec{x}-\vec{x}'}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|^3}.

Of course, in the here considered case, you have to integrate along the semicircle and use the charge per length instead of the bulk-charge density. However, you should check, whether you have all the geometrical factors for you vector component right.
 
Vanhees is right , Electric field is a vector .
So regarding the E will be in radial direction .
For the Y axis we need to consider the j component .

Vanhees , your mathematical expression is a bit high beyond my math skill xD !

My question is why the final expression for the problem is wrong :/

i considered the +Q and -Q E vector addition

I reached to the conclusion of

|E| = Q/(4*pi^2*e*r^2) (In the direction of J

Btw : how do u write the math expressions in that style xD . my way of typing the math is silly :/ !
 
The final equation i got was actually correct

i made an error with the calculation that's why my answer was wrong :)
 
Last edited:
Yes, I've checked your result too. It's correct. I parametrized the line charge with help of the charge per angle:

\lambda(\varphi)=\begin{cases}<br /> -\frac{2 Q}{\pi} &amp; \text{for} \quad 0 \leq \varphi \leq \pi/2 \\<br /> +\frac{2Q}{\pi} &amp; \text{for} \quad \pi/2&lt;\varphi\leq \pi \\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{elsewhere}.<br /> \end{cases}<br />

Then you can use my formula for \vec{x}=0 to get

\vec{E}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi&#039; \lambda(\varphi&#039;) \begin{pmatrix} -\cos \varphi&#039; \\ -\sin \varphi&#039; \\0 \end{pmatrix}.

Integrating over the two regions gives finally

\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{\pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2} \vec{e}_x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
873
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
617
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K