Electric Field of extended mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at the origin due to a semicircular wire with charges +Q and -Q. The initial approach involved integrating over the semicircle but mistakenly included the wrong limits, leading to an incorrect result of 2413 N/C. It was clarified that the integration should be from 0 to π/2 for each charge segment, and the electric field must be treated as a vector, considering both x and y components. Ultimately, the correct expression for the electric field was derived, confirming that the final equation was accurate despite earlier calculation errors. The participants emphasized the importance of proper integration limits and vector addition in electric field calculations.
Redoctober
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
So here is the scenario (see attachment) - I have a semicircle wire (radius R=15.9cm) which is made of insulator material , the semicircle consist of two combined quartercircle wires parts where one has equally distributed charge +Q and the other has -Q . Required is find the Electric field in direction of x at the origin . Q=5.33nC

My approach was as follows

Let E = 1/(4*pi*e)∫1/(R^2).dQ r

dQ=λ*ds and ds=R*dθ and i also know that unit vector r = cosθ*i+sinθ*j

therefore for the E in x direction i get this expression

E = 1/(4*pi*e)*1/(R^2)*λ*R∫cosθ.dθ

Integrating from 0 to pi ( thus taking only half of the semicircle ) and using λ as 2/(pi*r)

I get Q/(2*pi^2*e*R^2) .
Because the other half has opposite charge i can say that the Etot = Eneg +Epos

Therefore i multiply the equation by two to finaly get

Q/(pi^2*e*R^2)

If i put the values given i get as absolute value 2413 N/C for Electric field at origin of circel in the direction of x

Unfortunately it is a wrong solution :( ! What is the mistake i hv done ?? Can anyone spot it ? Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Picture.png
    Picture.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 440
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Redoctober! :smile:
Redoctober said:
Integrating from 0 to pi ( thus taking only half of the semicircle ) …

noooo :cry:

0 to π/2 :redface:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Redoctober! :smile:


noooo :cry:

0 to π/2 :redface:

Oh ! srrry typo error :S :S , i integrated from 0 to pi/2 .
The answer 2413 N/C is wrong :/ !
 
Anyone has a solution ?? :/ !
 
The E field for the right part of your semi circle is given by
E = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{-Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} d\theta
While the E field for the left part is the same but with +Q charge and integrated from \frac{\pi}{2} to \pi. Just add these two together to get the total field.
 
Are you sure? An electric field is a vector, and the correct formula is

\vec{E}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \rho(\vec{x}') \frac{\vec{x}-\vec{x}'}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|^3}.

Of course, in the here considered case, you have to integrate along the semicircle and use the charge per length instead of the bulk-charge density. However, you should check, whether you have all the geometrical factors for you vector component right.
 
Vanhees is right , Electric field is a vector .
So regarding the E will be in radial direction .
For the Y axis we need to consider the j component .

Vanhees , your mathematical expression is a bit high beyond my math skill xD !

My question is why the final expression for the problem is wrong :/

i considered the +Q and -Q E vector addition

I reached to the conclusion of

|E| = Q/(4*pi^2*e*r^2) (In the direction of J

Btw : how do u write the math expressions in that style xD . my way of typing the math is silly :/ !
 
The final equation i got was actually correct

i made an error with the calculation that's why my answer was wrong :)
 
Last edited:
Yes, I've checked your result too. It's correct. I parametrized the line charge with help of the charge per angle:

\lambda(\varphi)=\begin{cases}<br /> -\frac{2 Q}{\pi} &amp; \text{for} \quad 0 \leq \varphi \leq \pi/2 \\<br /> +\frac{2Q}{\pi} &amp; \text{for} \quad \pi/2&lt;\varphi\leq \pi \\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{elsewhere}.<br /> \end{cases}<br />

Then you can use my formula for \vec{x}=0 to get

\vec{E}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi&#039; \lambda(\varphi&#039;) \begin{pmatrix} -\cos \varphi&#039; \\ -\sin \varphi&#039; \\0 \end{pmatrix}.

Integrating over the two regions gives finally

\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{\pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2} \vec{e}_x.
 
Back
Top