Electric Field of Non-Conducting Sheets.

AI Thread Summary
Three infinitely large non-conducting sheets are charged with surface charge densities of +2x10^-6 C/m², +4x10^-6 C/m², and -5.0x10^-6 C/m². The electric field at point P can be calculated using the formula E = Sigma/(2ε₀), which is derived from Gauss's Law, indicating that the distance between the sheets does not affect the electric field strength. The net electric field is determined by vectorially adding the contributions from each sheet, taking into account their charge signs. As the electric field is independent of distance for uniformly charged infinite sheets, the focus should be on the surface charge densities. Understanding this principle simplifies the calculation of the net electric field at point P.
dvsumosize
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3 Infinitely large non conductiong sheets are uniformly charged with surface charge densities Sigma1 = +2x10^-6c/m^2, Sigma2 = +4x10^-6c/m^2, Sigma3 = -5.0x10^-6c/m^2. Distance L = 1.6cm. What is the magnitude and direction of the net electric field at point P?




* P
| L/2
________________ Sigma3
|
|
| 2 *L
|
________________ Sigma2
| L
|
________________ Sigma 1


Homework Equations


The only 1 i know of is E = Sigma/(2*εnot)


The Attempt at a Solution



Es1 + Es2 + Es3 = Etot at P.




So my teacher never really taught us about non-conducting sheets over any distance, and instead told us to google it and ask on forums instead. Please me through how you do this, i can't find a formula that deals with distance between non-conducting sheets.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
electric fields are added as vectors. just add them with sign.
 
Use Gauss's Law.
 
Which formula from that law will i use, the only one i know is the E = Sigma/(2 * e-not)
 
Last edited:
dvsumosize said:
Which formula from that law will i use, the only one i know is the E = Sigma/(2 * e-not)
That's a result which can be obtained from Gauss's Law.

Gauss's Law: \oint_S\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A}=\frac{q_{inside}}{\epsilon_0}
 
Cramster tells me what i did at the beginning was right, distance doesn't matter in this case. Why did none of you tell me so?
 
It's rather hard to read your mind well enough to know what you do & don't understand.
 
distance doesn't matter here, as electric field is independent of distance for uniformly charged infinite sheet.
 
I see.
 
  • #10
so did you get the answer?
 
  • #11
yeah
 
  • #12
the same formula sigma/(2epsilon) can be obtained as follows:
A Gaussian surface in the form of cylindrical surface can be taken.The field is perpendicular to sheet so only end caps contribute to flux.
=>(epsilon)*(sufaceintegral(E.dA))=q

=>(epsilon)*(EA+EA)=sigma*A
=>(epsilon)*(2EA)=sigma*A

canceling A from both sides & rearranging:

=>E=sigma/(2*epsilon)

Thus for a very large non-conducting sheet distance doesn't matter at all!what matters is sigma.so just as per vectors the electric fields depending upon nature of charge(positive or negative).If negative sigma then E is generally taken as negative(however you can take anything!).So the data regarding distance is irrelevant here!
 
Back
Top