Solving Excess Charge Problem at Point 1

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the electric field strength at a point due to an excess negative charge on a conducting box. The surface density of excess electrons is given as 31 x 10^10 electrons/m^2. The charge is calculated using the formula q = Ne, resulting in 5 x 10^-8 C/m^2. Dividing this charge by the permittivity constant (8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2) yields an electric field strength of approximately 5604.5 N/C. The calculations and units have been confirmed as correct.
jincy34
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The conducting box has been given an excess negative charge. The surface density of excess electrons at the center of the top surface is 31 x 10^10 electrons/m^2. What is the electric field strength at point 1?
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/680/knightfigure27262bn2.jpg

Homework Equations



E = linear charge density/E0
linear charge density=q/L
q=N(e)

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the charge
q=Ne
=(31*10^10 electrons/m^2)*(1.6*10^-19)
=5*10^-8 C/m^2
E=(5*10^-8 electrons/m^2)/(8.85*10^-12)
=5604.5
Can someone please conform if am right ?
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_27_26-2.jpg
    knight_Figure_27_26-2.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 1,059
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
please upload your images at a service like http://imageshack.us or http://bayimg.com . We are not able to see your attachment as it is pending approval...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is correct. We can double check by looking at the units. Finding the charge gives us:

q=Ne=(31*10^10 electrons/m^2)*(1.6*10^-19 C/electron)
=5*10^-8 C/m^2

Than dividing by the permittivity constant, 8.85*10^-12 C^2/Nm^s gets the units into the units of electric field, N/C
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top