How Do You Calculate Electric Field Intensity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electric field intensity using the formula E = KQ/r², where E represents the electric field, Q is the source charge, and r is the distance. Participants analyze the forces acting on a point charge due to multiple source charges, noting how to combine the effects using vector components. There is confusion regarding the correct application of the superposition principle and potential computational errors, particularly with unit conversions and significant figures. One participant successfully resolves their issue after considering the significance of precision in online systems. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in calculating electric fields and the importance of careful component analysis.
Ush
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question, along with my attempt is in the image attached. P

Homework Equations



E = KQ/r2
E = electric field
Q = source charge
r = distance

The Attempt at a Solution



see document attached

----
thank you!
 

Attachments

  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I haven't run through the numbers, but theoretically it seems possible.
The electric field at whatever point is what would act on an imagined point positive charge, so with that in mind:

You have q1 pulling the charge left, and q3 pushing it also left. q2 has no horizontal affect.

Then you've done the nice Pythagoras stuff and found that q1 pulls the charge down, but q2 and q3 push it upwards. Since q2 + q3 have a greater magnitude than q1, they will win.

Pythagoras-ing horizontal and vertical components gives your perfectly depicted arrow, and a magnitude that agrees in sign with this hand waving argument.
Was there something you didn't understand?
 
Last edited:
Onamor said:
Was there something you didn't understand?

to me, it makes sense. But to the computer marking my answer, it does not =[
 
Hmm, do you know what the correct answer is?

I got a different answer to yours with just the superposition equation:
ddca45ddf0a04f30a7280a846389febf.png


It may just be a computational mistake - when you are calculating the components, you have them on the order nC (x10^-9 in SI units). But the Coulomb constant is
cimg336.gif

So they should not be of this order.
 

Attachments

  • ddca45ddf0a04f30a7280a846389febf.png
    ddca45ddf0a04f30a7280a846389febf.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 364
  • cimg336.gif
    cimg336.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 396
I checked over my calculations but i get the same number, I don't know what the correct answer is

I'm not sure how you did your superposition,
but that just looks like the equation for E, - the sum of the electric fields. Electric fields are vectors, you can't add them without breaking them into components- at least I don't know how to yet-
 
pleaseeee someone help!?
 
I didn't check your arithmetic, but your method looks correct.
 
the computer keeps marking it wrong though =/ this seems like a simple question..
 
Often the online systems are fussy about significant figures--some of them insist on 3 sig figs no matter what.
 
  • #10
gosh.. thanks o_o it worked!
 
Back
Top