Electric Field Strenght on a point due to surface charge from an infinte sheet

AI Thread Summary
To determine the electric field strength at a distance of 6.40 cm from a large, thin, non-conducting sheet with a surface charge density of 0.3540 μC/m², the appropriate formula is E = σ/(2ε₀), where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space. The distance from the sheet is not critical for this calculation, as the electric field due to an infinite sheet is considered constant for distances much smaller than the sheet's dimensions. The user expresses uncertainty about how to apply the formulas, particularly regarding the relevance of distance. Clarification is provided that the distance does not affect the electric field strength in this scenario. The discussion emphasizes understanding the application of the infinite sheet formula to solve the problem effectively.
Failbot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A large, thin, non-conducting sheet has a surface charge density of 0.3540 \muC/m^{2}. Determine the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 6.40 cm from the sheet.


Homework Equations


Electric Field of Charged Disc
E=\frac{\sigma}{2e\ =\ 1.602176462(63)\ \times\ 10^{-19}\ C}(1-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}})

Infinite sheet
E=\frac{\sigma}{2e}


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea what to do here. I assume I use the infinite sheet equation but how would I use the 6.4 cm to find the field strength there? I feel like maybe I have to use the equation for field strength E=\frac{kQ}{r^{2}} some how but I have no ideas.


Sorry for the sloppy post this is my first post on these boards...Help please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Failbot said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea what to do here...
Infinite sheet
E=\frac{\sigma}{2e}

If you have a formula you believe is correct, why not use it? Sure, you can't substitute the distance into the formula, but that is because the formula says that the field is approximately constant for distances small compared to the expanse of the slab, so distance does not matter.

An analogous question in mechanics would be, "what is the gravitational field 1 meter off the ground of the Earth?". Then someone else might ask, "what is the gravitational field 100 meters off the ground of the Earth?". Hopefully the fact that someone threw in the exact height, even though it is not critical, would not prevent you from answering the question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top