Electric fields caused by multiple charges

AI Thread Summary
To find the position on the x-axis where the electric field strength is zero, one must consider both the electric field produced by the charge and the uniform electric field. The equation E = kq/r^2 is relevant for calculating the field from the charge. The net electric field will equal zero on the negative x-axis, requiring the setup of an equation that balances the two fields. By determining the distance d along the negative x-axis where the electric field is zero, one can subtract this distance from 3 m to find the exact position. The solution involves understanding vector addition of electric fields and solving for the distance where they cancel each other out.
mcassi17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A particle with charge +7.88 μC is placed at the fixed position x = 3.00 m in an electric field of uniform strength 300 N/C, directed in the positive x direction. Find the position on the x-axis where the electric field strength of the resulting configuration is zero.


the equation i have is E = kq/r^2

I have no idea where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two electric fields in this problem: the one produced by the charge (that's what your equation is for), and the uniform one. To get the total electric field, you just add the two up (remember that they're vectors). So can you write an equation that you can solve to find the position where the total electric field is zero?
 
So i would set it up to be -300 but that can't be because you can't have a negative square root.
 
mcassi17 said:
So i would set it up to be -300 but that can't be because you can't have a negative square root.
How did you get -300?
Net electric field will be zero on the negative x-axis. If d is the distance along the negative x-axis, where electric field is zero, then E = kq/d^2. Find the magnitude of d. Subtract 3 m to find the position on negative x-axis where E is zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top