Electric flux through a cube problem

AI Thread Summary
The electric flux through the top and bottom faces of the cube is zero because the angle between the electric field and these surfaces is 90 degrees, resulting in no contribution to the flux. The total electric flux through the cube is also zero, as the electric field enters through two faces and exits through the other two. The correct formula for calculating electric flux is Φ = EA cos(θ), where θ is the angle between the electric field and the normal to the surface. A misunderstanding of the angle, such as thinking it is 180 degrees, leads to incorrect calculations. Visualizing the scenario with a diagram can clarify the relationships between the electric field and the cube's surfaces.
erik-the-red
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Question:

The cube in the figure (attachment) has sides of length L=10.0 {\rm cm}. The electric field is uniform, has a magnitude E=4.00 \times 10^{3} {\rm N}/{\rm C}, and is parallel to the xy-plane at an angle of 36.9^\circc measured from the + x - {\rm axis} toward the + y - {\rm axis}.

The question asks for the electric fluxes through each of the faces and the sum.

I don't really understand why the electric flux through the top and bottom faces of the cube is zero. Is it because the angle between the face and the electric field is 90^\circ?

The sum is zero because the electric field goes in through two of the faces and then leaves through two others, right?

My answer for the electric flux through face one was E \cdot L^2 or (4.00*10^(3))*(.10^2), but that was wrong. I thought the angle was 180?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really understand why the electric flux through the top and bottom faces of the cube is zero. Is it because the angle between the face and the electric field is 90?
Yes. The flux is \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}. The dot product can be rewritten with a cosine. Since the angle between the field and the surface is 90 degrees, the flux resolves to zero.

The electric field is piercing the surface at an angle. Draw a diagram. Since you know that \Phi = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}, evaluate that integral (which, in this simplified case, can be written as \Phi = EA\cos{\theta}). The angle is not 180.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top