Understanding Electric Force: Calculating Change in Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the change in potential energy when a charge +q is moved from a distance of 3r to 2r by a charge -q. The initial calculations involve using the work-energy principle and the formula for electric potential energy, resulting in an expression for deltaU. However, confusion arises regarding the interpretation of the potential energy formula and the correct application of the distance in the context of the problem. The participant realizes the mistake in their understanding but indicates that they have encountered another problem related to the topic. The discussion highlights the complexities of electric force and potential energy calculations in electrostatics.
soljaragz
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Here is the question that I have no idea what is happening

"What is the change in potential energy of a particle of charge +q that is brougt from a distance of 3r to a distance of 2r by a particle of charge -q? "

Here's what I tried

-W = deltaU
W = qEd
W = (kq1q2/r^2) d
d= 3r - 2r = r

substituting I get
W = kq1q2/r
so deltaU = -kq1q2/r.....im correct up to here, but its not the final answer according to the book,...the explanation then shows some weird things that I don't understand.

but isn't the question asking for change in potential
so shouldn't deltaU (-kq1q2/r) be the answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: The potential energy of two charges separated by a distance r is given by kq1q2/r (where the zero level is taken to be at r = infinity).
 
[nvm i get it now]
I have another problem though
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top