Electric Heating Coil: Potential Difference in 3.5 mins

FlipStyle1308
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
An electric heating coil is immersed in 4.2 kg of water at 22°C. The coil, which has a resistance of 260 Ω, warms the water to 33°C in 3.5 mins. What is the potential difference at which the coil operates?

I was looking through the chapter, and did not see any equations that I can use that involve temperatures, but does this problem involve the equation q(t) = CE[1-e^(-t/T)]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the quantity of heat absorbed by water? Heat absorbed by water is heat dissipated by heater. Once you know the wattage and resistance of heater, calculate the voltage.
 
Here's what I did, and I got my answer wrong, but see if you can catch my mistake:

C = Q/mT = 4186 J/(kgK) = Q/(4.2 kg)(306.15 K - 295.15 K) => Q = 193,393.2 C
I = Q/t = 193,393.2 C / 210 s = 920.92 A
V = IR = (920.92 A)(260 ohm) = 239,439.2 V

I thought my overall answer seemed somewhat high, and I was right. Are any of the equations I used incorrect?
 
Last edited:
Bump! Is anyone able to determine what I am doing wrong?
 
The solution for this problem should not involve capacitanc, charges etc.
It's much simpler.
First you calculate the amount of heat the water absorbed.
Heat=specific heat * mass * temperature difference
The heat is the energy that the resistor transferred to the water, in a certain amount of time. Hence the power is
Power = energy / time
now use the formula
(Voltage)^2 / resistance = power
and that's it.
 
Awesome, thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top