Electric Potential and Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric potential and electric field strength at a distance x along the axis from the center of a uniformly charged ring with radius R and total charge Q. Participants suggest treating the ring as two point charges to simplify calculations, leading to the expression for electric potential V as -Q/(4πε(x² + R²)^(1/2)). The electric field E is derived as the negative gradient of the potential, resulting in E = -[Qx]/[4πε(x² + R²)^(3/2)]. The conversation emphasizes the importance of conceptualizing the problem through incremental steps, such as considering multiple point charges. Overall, the thread provides insights into the mathematical approach for solving the problem of electric potential and field from a charged ring.
debwaldy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


derive an expression for the electrical potential at a distance x measured along the axis from the centre of a circular ring of radius R on which a charge Q is uniformly distributed.hence derive an expression for the electric field strength at this point


Homework Equations


to be honest I am not too sure where to go after:
V= -⌠E.dl
any guidance at all would be much appreciated!thanks:biggrin:


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like a start, what if the "ring" were simply two charges, each of 1/2Q, and -r,0 and r,0 relative to a test charge at 0,x. What would that look like?
 
This simply involves a lil integration.

Q is distributed uniformly throughout the ring. This linear charge denstity on it would be lambda= Q/2pi*R.

Let dV due to each infinitesimally small element (dl) on the ring = (1/4pi*epsilon)*(lambda*dl/(x^2+R^2)^1/2.

Then just integrate from 0 to 2pi*R.
 
oh i see, so its ok to treat them as 2 separate point charges and then sum the electric potentials at the end.
doing this i got an expression:
V= - Q/4*pi*ε(x^2 + R^2)^1/2

and E= dV/dx
E = - [Qx]/[4*pi*ε(x^2 + r^2)^3/2]
 
no, what i meant was look at it first as 2 point charges, then 4, then an infinite number spread around the ring, but Mr 4 points the way I was hinting at in post above directly.
 
Quite so. I think your logic would be more useful in some questions. Thanks for that denverdoc.
 
Mr.4 said:
Quite so. I think your logic would be more useful in some questions. Thanks for that denverdoc.

Still getting the hang of helping without doing the work, ie trying to help posters conceptualize w/o telling them how to pursue directly. Sometimes I think I just add to the confusion
J
 
Nope. I get you loud and clear! Maybe its coz I'm just as confusing!
 
Back
Top