Electric Potential at Cylinder Center: Calculating Error

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a hollow cylindrical shell with a uniform charge distribution. The initial calculation contains errors, particularly in the expression for dq, which should be dq = eta * dL, and the integral limits that must encompass the entire length of the cylinder. Additionally, the height of the cylinder must be included in the denominator of the potential equation. The direction of the electric field at the center is also crucial for determining the potential. Careful consideration of geometry, units, and constants is recommended to ensure accuracy in the calculations.
brichugh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A hollow cylindrical shell of length L and radius R has charge Q uniformly distributed along its length. What is the electric potential at the center of the cylinder?

I use eta = Q/A = Q/2piRL

dq = (eta)*dA = Q/(2piRL)*2piRdL

dV = 1 / 4 pi epsilon 0 * dq/r where r = sqrt(L^2+R^2)

V = Q/(4*pi*epsilon_0)*int(dL/(sqrt(L^2+R^2)))

This seems to be incorrect can someone tell me where I have gone wrong?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing an H = height of the cylinder in the denominator of the equation.


Also limits of the integral (-h/2 -> h/2) if your referance point is the middle of the cylinder.
 
Last edited:


There are a few potential sources of error in your calculation. Firstly, the expression for dq should be dq = eta * dL, since dA is equal to R * dL for a cylindrical shell. Secondly, the integral should be taken over the entire length of the cylinder, not just a small portion of it. Additionally, it is important to consider the direction of the electric field at the center of the cylinder, since the potential will depend on the direction of the field. It may be helpful to draw a diagram and carefully consider the geometry and direction of the electric field lines. I would also recommend double checking the units and constants used in the calculation to ensure they are consistent. Overall, it is always a good idea to double check your work and carefully consider the physical meaning of the equations being used.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top