Electric potential at the edge of a thin charged circular plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at the edge of a thin charged circular plate using integration. The user initially derived the potential but encountered a negative sign due to incorrect integration limits. They were advised that integrating from π/2 to 0 is necessary because the variable 'r' must be positive, corresponding to the correct range of θ. The confusion was resolved by recognizing that the limits should reflect the physical constraints of the problem. Ultimately, the user acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification.
Aryamaan Thakur
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
To find the electric potential at the edge of a thin circular plate of radius R carrying uniformly distributed charge of surface density σ
Relevant Equations
dV = (1/4πε) dq/r
l = rθ
My question might sound stupid to you but please clear my confusions.

I'm taking an circular arc like element on the plate. That arc has a radius of 'r' (AB) and the radius is inclined at an angle 'θ' with OA (∠OAB).
figure.png

The area between arc of radius r and r+dr is dA.
dA = 2θr.dr
The charge on this area will be dq
dq = σ dA = 2σθr.dr

From ΔAOB, the relation between r and R is:
r = 2Rcosθ
taking derivative on both sides gives:
dr = -2Rsinθ

Potential due to this area at edge A is dV
dV = (1/4πεr) dq = (1/4πε) (-4σRθsinθ.dθ)

So, V comes out to be ∫ dV = (-σR/πε) ∫ θsinθ.dθ
taking limits from 0 to π/2, the integral gives 1

V = (-σR/πε)

I got the right magnitude but wrong sign. Some resources on internet say I should integrate from π/2 to 0.
What is the problem in integrating from 0 to π/2? Why am I getting a negative sign? And why should I integrate from π/2 to 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aryamaan Thakur said:
why should I integrate from π/2 to 0?
Because you started with dr, which is only going to be positive if your integration range is from 0 to 2R (not the other way around).
r=0 corresponds to θ=π/2.
 
  • Like
Likes Aryamaan Thakur
It was just this...😂 I solved the whole problem and put the wrong limits😂😂😂
Thanks a lot:smile: You cleared my confusion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top