Electric potential at the edge of a thin charged circular plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at the edge of a thin charged circular plate using integration. The user initially derived the potential but encountered a negative sign due to incorrect integration limits. They were advised that integrating from π/2 to 0 is necessary because the variable 'r' must be positive, corresponding to the correct range of θ. The confusion was resolved by recognizing that the limits should reflect the physical constraints of the problem. Ultimately, the user acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification.
Aryamaan Thakur
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
To find the electric potential at the edge of a thin circular plate of radius R carrying uniformly distributed charge of surface density σ
Relevant Equations
dV = (1/4πε) dq/r
l = rθ
My question might sound stupid to you but please clear my confusions.

I'm taking an circular arc like element on the plate. That arc has a radius of 'r' (AB) and the radius is inclined at an angle 'θ' with OA (∠OAB).
figure.png

The area between arc of radius r and r+dr is dA.
dA = 2θr.dr
The charge on this area will be dq
dq = σ dA = 2σθr.dr

From ΔAOB, the relation between r and R is:
r = 2Rcosθ
taking derivative on both sides gives:
dr = -2Rsinθ

Potential due to this area at edge A is dV
dV = (1/4πεr) dq = (1/4πε) (-4σRθsinθ.dθ)

So, V comes out to be ∫ dV = (-σR/πε) ∫ θsinθ.dθ
taking limits from 0 to π/2, the integral gives 1

V = (-σR/πε)

I got the right magnitude but wrong sign. Some resources on internet say I should integrate from π/2 to 0.
What is the problem in integrating from 0 to π/2? Why am I getting a negative sign? And why should I integrate from π/2 to 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aryamaan Thakur said:
why should I integrate from π/2 to 0?
Because you started with dr, which is only going to be positive if your integration range is from 0 to 2R (not the other way around).
r=0 corresponds to θ=π/2.
 
  • Like
Likes Aryamaan Thakur
It was just this...😂 I solved the whole problem and put the wrong limits😂😂😂
Thanks a lot:smile: You cleared my confusion.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top