Electric Potential Inside an Infinite Rectangular Trough

Zachreham
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables a
nd given/known data


A rectangular trough extends infinitely along the z direction, and has a cross section as shown in the figure. All the faces are grounded, except for the top one, which is held at a potential V(x) = V_0 sin(7pix/b). Find the potential inside the trough.
The length along the x direction is b, and the length along the y direction is a.

Homework Equations



Laplace's equation in rectangular coordinates

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I know that my solution will be V(x,y,z)=X(x)*Y(y)*Z(z) and have already solved the x-dependent and y-dependent parts of the solution. After applying boundary condition I obtained:
X(x) = Asin(n*pi*x/b) where n= 1, 2, 3...
Y(y) = Csin(m*pi*x/a) where m= 1, 2, 3...

Solving for the Z-dependent part is when i run into some trouble...
I know that in a case where we're dealing with a finite rectangle with 5 faces being grounded and one being held at a certain potential that the Z solution would be comprised of sinh and cosh and the eigenvalue would be gamma^2= -(npi/b)^2 - (mpi/a)^2. However, the potential doesn't necessarily vanish at one end point in this problem, because our trough is not finite.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. Welcome to PF!

The trough is infinite in the ±z-directions and none of the boundary conditions depend on z. This suggests trying to find a solution V(x, y, z) that does not depend on z.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top