Electric Potential Of Charged Finite Rod

Dylicious
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin rod extends along the z-axis from z=-d to z=d, carrying uniformly distributed charge along it's length with charge density lambda. Calculate the potential at P1 on the z-axis with coordinates (0,0,2d). Then find an equal potential at point P2 somewhere on the x-axis


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I tried setting up an integral for the potential along the z-axis as such:
V= \int(1/4\pi\epsilon) * \lambdadz/z

but I'm not 100% sure how I should set up the boundaries? Also, since there aren't going to be any actual number answers I'm unsure as to how to equivocate my answer to some potential on the x-axis.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the equation for V should actually read

V = k \int \lambda dz'/z

if that will help. Whenever a problem in EM is not immediately obvious to me, I always go to vectors.

V = k \int \lambda dl' \hat{R}/RIn this case you have R, which is the distance from the charge under consideration to the point of interest, r, which is the distance from the origin to the point of interest, and r', which is the distance from the origin to the charge under consideration. We know that R=r-r', and we need to sum up (integrate) over all the little possible charges of interest.

Give the boundaries and solution a try. You'll know you're on the right track if you get ln3.
 
I see, I integrated assuming P1 to be the origin, 0, and then from d to 3d and got lambda*K*ln(3) !

Thank You!
 
Yeah, that's the best way to do this particular set-up. You still have have to do the second part of the problem! :p

P.S. With that vector method I described to use its usually useful to note that (though in the Z part of the problem it didn't really come into play)

\hat{R}=\mathbf{R}/R
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top