Electric Potential: Q, a, b, Vb & Va

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential difference between two coaxial conductors, where the inner conductor has a charge density of 1 C/m and the outer conductor is grounded. The potential difference is expressed as V = (Q/4πε0)(1/a - 1/b), with the outer conductor's potential Vb set to 0 V. There is confusion regarding the value of Q, specifically whether it should be treated as Q = 1 * L, where L is the length of the conductors. The charge density is clarified as ρ = 1 C / (2πa m²), leading to a discussion on deriving the electric field and integrating it to find the potential. The thread concludes with a request for the correct solutions to the problem.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I would like to have some guidance with this problem. i would like to know please, if I do good or bad.

A coaxial line is made of two perfect conductors. The inner cylinder has radius a and the radius of the outer one is b. The outer conductor is grounded.
Suppose that the inner conductor carries 1[C] of charge per meter of its length, that is its equivalent line charge density is ρlo=1[C/m].

a- Find the potential difference between the two conductors.
b- What is the potential of the outer conductor?
c- What is the potential of the inner conductor?


a-
V= (Q/4*pi* ε0)( 1/a-1/b)

with Q=?

b-
Vb=0[V]

c-

Va=(Q/4*pi*ε0)(1/a)

I have some issue with the value of Q. since the length is not specified should Q be Q=1*L=L (Length)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick here is to figure out the charge density which is :

\rho = \frac {1 Coulomb} {2 \pi a meter^2} <br />

You have to divide the C/meter by the distance around which of course is a 2 a \pi meter. That gives you the charge density on the surface.

Given the density, you can solve for the electrical field which is what you were close to doing in your answer in part a.

That isn't quite right since the electric field has a direction, but that can be ignored in this problem if we assume everything is along the radial direction.

The only problem is that isn't the potential. You need to integrate the negative the distance from b to a to get the potential.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what the correct solutions are to this problem?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top