Electric Potential: Q, a, b, Vb & Va

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential difference between two coaxial conductors, where the inner conductor has a charge density of 1 C/m and the outer conductor is grounded. The potential difference is expressed as V = (Q/4πε0)(1/a - 1/b), with the outer conductor's potential Vb set to 0 V. There is confusion regarding the value of Q, specifically whether it should be treated as Q = 1 * L, where L is the length of the conductors. The charge density is clarified as ρ = 1 C / (2πa m²), leading to a discussion on deriving the electric field and integrating it to find the potential. The thread concludes with a request for the correct solutions to the problem.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I would like to have some guidance with this problem. i would like to know please, if I do good or bad.

A coaxial line is made of two perfect conductors. The inner cylinder has radius a and the radius of the outer one is b. The outer conductor is grounded.
Suppose that the inner conductor carries 1[C] of charge per meter of its length, that is its equivalent line charge density is ρlo=1[C/m].

a- Find the potential difference between the two conductors.
b- What is the potential of the outer conductor?
c- What is the potential of the inner conductor?


a-
V= (Q/4*pi* ε0)( 1/a-1/b)

with Q=?

b-
Vb=0[V]

c-

Va=(Q/4*pi*ε0)(1/a)

I have some issue with the value of Q. since the length is not specified should Q be Q=1*L=L (Length)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick here is to figure out the charge density which is :

\rho = \frac {1 Coulomb} {2 \pi a meter^2} <br />

You have to divide the C/meter by the distance around which of course is a 2 a \pi meter. That gives you the charge density on the surface.

Given the density, you can solve for the electrical field which is what you were close to doing in your answer in part a.

That isn't quite right since the electric field has a direction, but that can be ignored in this problem if we assume everything is along the radial direction.

The only problem is that isn't the potential. You need to integrate the negative the distance from b to a to get the potential.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what the correct solutions are to this problem?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top