Electrical Force At Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two known charges, -10.4 µC and 46.4 µC, placed on the x-axis, with the goal of finding the location and magnitude of an unknown charge that achieves equilibrium. Initially, a participant calculated the unknown charge's position as -0.0497 cm, which was incorrect according to webassign. After further analysis and assistance from another user, the correct solution was determined to be at -14 cm with a magnitude of 37.44 µC. The conversation highlights the importance of collaboration in solving complex physics problems. The final answer demonstrates the successful application of electric force concepts to achieve equilibrium.
zakaqel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This a problem which was assigned using webassign:


Two known charges, -10.4 µC and 46.4 µC, and an unknown charge are located on the x axis. The charge -10.4 µC is at the origin, and the charge 46.4 µC is at x = 15.6 cm. The unknown charge is to be placed so that each charge is in equilibrium under the action of the electric forces exerted by the other two charges. Find the required location and magnitude of the unknown charge.

I got -0.0497 cm for part 1 of the question(which webassign says is wrong). I don't know how to answer part two the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

zakaqel said:
Two known charges, -10.4 µC and 46.4 µC, and an unknown charge are located on the x axis. The charge -10.4 µC is at the origin, and the charge 46.4 µC is at x = 15.6 cm. The unknown charge is to be placed so that each charge is in equilibrium under the action of the electric forces exerted by the other two charges. Find the required location and magnitude of the unknown charge.

I got -0.0497 cm for part 1 of the question(which webassign says is wrong).

Hi zakaqel! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Show us how you got -0.0497 cm, and then we can see where you went wrong. :wink:
 
Thank you tiny-tim. I actually ended up solving the problem. The answer is -14 cm and the charge is 37.44 uc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top