Electricity and magnetism - planar symmetry question: plastic sheets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of charge density between two charged plastic sheets based on their electric field strengths. The electric field strength between sheets 1 and 2 is given as 2x10^5, while between sheets 2 and 3, it is 6x10^5. The central sheet's charge density must be higher than that of the outer sheets due to its role in supporting both electric fields. By applying Gauss' law and substituting the electric field values, the ratio of charge density on sheet 3 to that on sheet 2 is determined to be 0.75. This calculation is crucial for understanding the behavior of electric fields in parallel plate configurations.
thehammer
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three plastic sheets that are large, parallel and uniformly charged are placed side-by-side. The electric field strength between sheets 1 and 2 is 2x105; the electric field strength between sheets 2 and 3 is 6x105. What is the ratio of the charge density on sheet 3 to that on sheet 2. Either side of the plates at the far end the field strength is 0.

Homework Equations


I don't know how to use Latex properly and don't have the time right now to find out so I'll just have to state the names of some of the equations.

Gauss' law.
E=\sigma/2\epsilon0.

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay. So what I did is firstly draw three sheets in a row. For an electric field to arise, the charge on sheet 2 must be different to both sheet 1 and 3. This implies that charge on sheets 1 and 3 must have the same sign.

Assuming the charge on the central plate to be negative, I drew two arrows going from the 1st plate to the 2nd plate for the fields that result from the positive and negative charged plates. I did the same for the 2nd and 3rd.

Consequently, three equations can be formed,

For the 1st and 2nd plates:

E = E(+) + E(-) = 2x105 = (\sigma/2)\epsilon0 + \sigma/2\epsilon0.

For the 2nd and 3rd plates:

E = E(+) + E(-) = 6x105 = (\sigma/2)\epsilon0 + \sigma/2\epsilon0.

Outside of the 3rd plate:

E = E(+) - E(-) = 0

---

I'm not sure about where to go from here. If the question or my answer isn't clear I could try to take a picture of the diagram in the book along with the question. I have an exam in electricity and magnetism in less than 2 weeks so I'm a little concerned. None of my friends that I have spoken to know what to do about this question either!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thehammer,

I'll take a shot at answering this but if I'm in error I'll be happy to learn better.

The central sheet serves as support for both electric fields.
Its total charge must be the same as the total charges on the two outside sheets.
Since the sheets are all the same size its charge density must be higher than that on the outside ones.

So

charge on sheet 2 = charge on sheet 1 + charge on sheet 3
charge density on sheet 2 = charge on sheet 2 / identical sheet area
therefore by substitution
charge density on sheet 2 = (charge on sheet 1 + charge on sheet 3) / identical sheet area
whereas
charge density on sheet 3 = charge on sheet 3 / identical sheet area
now
the ratio you want is = charge density on sheet 3 / charge density on sheet 2
eliminating the identical sheet areas this simplifies to
the ratio you want is = charge on sheet 3 /(charge on sheet 1 + charge on sheet 3)
relating these to the electric fields
the ratio you want is = electric field on 3 /(electric field on 1 + electric field on 3)
the ratio you want is = 6*10e5 / (2*10e5 + 6*10e5 ) = 6/8
the ratio you want is = 0.75
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top