Electricity, Direction of Charge Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quiz problem involving three charges arranged in an equilateral triangle, where the participant lost points for not providing x and y components for one of the forces. The participant calculated the electric force on charge q3 but was marked incorrect for not separating the force from charge q2 into components. It is emphasized that all vector quantities must specify both magnitude and direction to avoid losing points, even if one component is zero. The conversation highlights the importance of clearly defining vector components in physics problems. The participant plans to address this grading issue with the teacher.
Bound
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Some background: This was a quiz I recently had in which I lost a few points for missing an "x & y component" for one of the directions.

My thinking is that because the problem was not actually set up with a specified order of charges there are a few different answers you could get.

I intend to bring this up with the teacher, but thought I'd see what you guys have to say as well.

Homework Statement


Three charges are arranged in the shape of an equilateral triangle. (Note- no diagram is given)

The charge magnitudes are as follows:
q1=+4*10-6C, q2=-6.5*10-6C, q3=+2.1*10-6C

The distance between each charge is 2m

Calculate the electric force on q3.

Homework Equations


F = (kq1q2) / d2

The Attempt at a Solution



I set my triangle up as: (see attached picture)

Calculated force of 1 on 3:
F = .0189 N

X-component of F13:
Fx=(.0189)(sin30)
=.00945 N

Y-component of F13:
Fy=(.0189)(cos30)
=.0163676801 N

*Marked Correct*

Calculated force of 2 on 3:
F = -.0307125 N

*Marked incorrect for not separating into x & y components*

Would this not be correct though? The way I set my triangle up has 2 on a straight horizontal line across from 3!

My further work is just adding up all of the components of everything for a final answer of:
Net Force on q3 = .0268 N @ 37.6deg SofW

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • paint.jpg
    paint.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 403
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bound said:
Some background: This was a quiz I recently had in which I lost a few points for missing an "x & y component" for one of the directions.

My thinking is that because the problem was not actually set up with a specified order of charges there are a few different answers you could get.

I intend to bring this up with the teacher, but thought I'd see what you guys have to say as well.

Homework Statement


Three charges are arranged in the shape of an equilateral triangle. (Note- no diagram is given)

The charge magnitudes are as follows:
q1=+4*10-6C, q2=-6.5*10-6C, q3=+2.1*10-6C

The distance between each charge is 2m

Calculate the electric force on q3.


Homework Equations


F = (kq1q2) / d2


The Attempt at a Solution



I set my triangle up as: (see attached picture)

Calculated force of 1 on 3:
F = .0189 N

X-component of F13:
Fx=(.0189)(sin30)
=.00945 N

Y-component of F13:
Fy=(.0189)(cos30)
=.0163676801 N

*Marked Correct*

Calculated force of 2 on 3:
F = -.0307125 N

*Marked incorrect for not separating into x & y components*

Would this not be correct though? The way I set my triangle up has 2 on a straight horizontal line across from 3!

My further work is just adding up all of the components of everything for a final answer of:
Net Force on q3 = .0268 N @ 37.6deg SofW

Thanks for any help!

You must always specify units and direction for any vector quantities, otherwise points will be deducted. It's not enough to assume that unspecified directions imply a direction along the positive x-axis (or Easterly), unless you so specify in your work.
 
So would I just have had to specify xx.xx N [0deg. E] to be correct?

Or are you implying that there is some arbitrary angle in which that force can be broken into a y-component, if so I don't have the first idea on how to find that angle.
 
Bound said:
So would I just have had to specify xx.xx N [0deg. E] to be correct?
That would work.
Or are you implying that there is some arbitrary angle in which that force can be broken into a y-component, if so I don't have the first idea on how to find that angle.
All planar vectors have two components, even if one of them happens to have a zero magnitude. When one of the components happens to be zero you can drop it so long as you've specified the direction for the remaining component. It would not be incorrect to include the zero magnitude component as, for example, 0.00 N [North].

In your work for the other forces you explicitly broke them out as Fx and Fy. You could have done the same for F23 and written

For F23:
Fx = xx.xx N
Fy = 0.00 N
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top