Electrodynamics and electrical fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in electrodynamics concerning the electric field inside a charged cylinder with a charge density proportional to the distance from the axis, specifically ρ = kr. Participants are exploring the application of Gauss' law to find the electric field within the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Gauss' law and the setup of a Gaussian surface to simplify the problem. Questions are raised about the interpretation of the electric field vector in different coordinate systems, specifically whether it should be in Cartesian or spherical coordinates. There is also a focus on the integration process and the handling of the normal vector.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on simplifying the integral by considering the geometry of the problem. Others express a desire to understand alternative approaches and clarify their reasoning regarding vector calculus. The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively questioning and refining their understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an emphasis on understanding the mathematical framework without arriving at a complete solution.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Electrodynamics and electrical fields

The question is: A long cylinder carries a charge density that is proportional to the distance from the axis ρ =kr, where k is a constant, r is the distance from the axis. Find electric field inside the cylinder.


My attempt: Ok, first of all we know from Gauss' law that \oint_S {{\bf{E}} \cdot d{\bf{a}}} = \frac{1}{{\varepsilon _0 }}Q.

We also know that Q = \int {\rho dV = } \int {k \cdot s \cdot s \cdot dsd\phi dz = \frac{2}{3}\pi kls^3 }. Here I have used a Gaussian cylinder of length l and radius s.

Now I must find \oint_S {{\bf{E}} \cdot d{\bf{a}}}.

First question: The electric field E is given by {\bf{E}} = \frac{1}{{4\pi \varepsilon _0 }}\frac{q}{{r^2 }}{\bf{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\frown$}} <br /> \over r} }}. Is the unit vector r in this case the spherical radius-vector?

For this cylinder, I write the parametric and differentiate it with respect to phi and z. Then I find the normal-vector as the cross-products of these two.

Question two: When I find the element da as above, what do I do with E, which is in spherical coordinates?

I hope you can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, you're making this way to hard for yourself. Assume our cylinder has radius a and height h, and choose our Gaussian surface to be a cylinder of radius r co-axial to the original cylinder. The electric field at any point on the Gaussian surface for a radius r \leq a has constant magnitude and is directed parallel to the surface normal there, so we can simplify the integral to

{\int_S E d{A}}​

and then to

E{\int_S d{A}}.​

Now, since {\int_S d{A}} is just the surface area of the Gaussian surface, which we know to be 2\pi r h, we can substitute that in, and we are left with the very simple equation

E 2\pi r h = \frac{q_{\mbox{enc}}{{\varepsilon _0 }}.​

I will leave it to you to include the density function in that.
 
Last edited:
foxjwill said:
Ok, you're making this way to hard for yourself. Assume our cylinder has radius a and height h, and choose our Gaussian surface to be a cylinder of radius r co-axial to the original cylinder. The electric field at any point on the Gaussian surface for a radius r \leq a has constant magnitude and is directed parallel to the surface normal there, so we can simplify the integral to

{\int_S E d{A}}​

and then to

E{\int_S d{A}}.​

Now, since {\int_S d{A}} is just the surface area of the Gaussian surface, which we know to be 2\pi r h, we can substitute that in, and we are left with the very simple equation

E 2\pi r h = \frac{Q}{{\varepsilon _0 }}.​

Hi foxjwill.

First, thanks for taking the time to reply. I can see that using the definition of the dot-product simplifies things greatly - but still I would like to know how it can be done "my way". I have just studied vector-calculus most of this week, and I am kinda disappointed in myself that I cannot figure it out.

The thing that annoys me is particularly the r unit-vector in E. Is this in Cartesian or Spherical coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Niles said:
The thing that annoys me is particularly the r unit-vector in E. Is this in Cartesian or Spherical coordinates?

Whichever is more convenient for the particular problem, as long as the same point is described. I'd suggest actually using cylindrical coordinates.
 
Ok, so <br /> {\bf{E}} = \frac{1}{{4\pi \varepsilon _0 }}\frac{q}{{r^2 }}\rho}<br />

I get that the normal-vector has the rho-component 3*cos(theta). I integrate this over theta and z, which are respectively 0..2Pi and 0..l - and this gives 0, which is not correct.

Where is my error?
 
Last edited:
I worked it out. d\vec{A} = \vec{n}*dA, and the vectors go out since they are parallel.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
898
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K