Electromagnetic fields: Eletric potential inside a non conductive sphere

GhostStudent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello all;
i am trying to calculate the potential, inside a non conductive sphere of radius equal to a, in a point at a distance r from the center of the sphere.

Homework Equations


i know that:
lLXjw.png

where E and s are vectors;
and that the Eletric field inside the sphere is:
bLOuE.png



The Attempt at a Solution



since the distance r is:
0<r<a
i changed the limits so that:
HaUIV.png


but here comes the part were i am stuck:
i found:
ltF89.png

but the correct answer, so far, should be
g3KkV.png

which means that the first integral [
QHClG.png
] should be equal to zero, but i can't seem to understand why

thx in advance.
p.s.:
please tell me if the images are not showing up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not clear why you have two line integrals. You should use

\varphi(r)-\varphi(a)=-\int^{r}_{a}\vec{E}\cdot \vec{ds}
 
i guess i was thinking more on terms of the path i should take, that's why my first integral ranges from 0 to a (size of the sphere), but since r is greater than 0 and smaller than a (because its inside the sphere, away from both the center and the surface) i changed the ranges.

dont know if i made it clear or not.

also, i was going to apply that equation, like you said, directly, but when my teacher demonstrated a similar problem in class, he also used those limits, so i guess i got a little mixed up.

thx man
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top