Electromagnetic Induction and rectangular loop

adrian116
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
the question is that:
A rectangular loop with width L and a slide wire with mass m are as shown in Fig. A uniform magnetic field \vec B is directed perpendicular to the plane of the loop into the plane of the figure. The slide wire is given an initial speed of v_0 and then released. There is no friction between the slide wire and the loop, and the resistance of the loop is negligiblein comparison to the resistance R of the slide wire. a) Obtain an expression for F, the magnitude of the force exerted on the wire while it is moving at speed v. b). Show that the distance x that the wire moves before coming to rest is \frac{m v_0 R}{a^2 B^2}

i have done part a ,
the ans. is \frac{B^2 L^2 v}{R}
but for part b ,
i can just calculate half of the value of x mentioned in the question.
i did it in this way

subt. F from a to F=ma to find the acceleration
then subt. the ans. to
v^2=u^2+2as by taking v=0 and u=v.
is there any mistake?
 

Attachments

  • Picture0005.jpg
    Picture0005.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 1,991
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
adrian116 said:
the question is that:
A rectangular loop with width L and a slide wire with mass m are as shown in Fig. A uniform magnetic field \vec B is directed perpendicular to the plane of the loop into the plane of the figure. The slide wire is given an initial speed of v_0 and then released. There is no friction between the slide wire and the loop, and the resistance of the loop is negligiblein comparison to the resistance R of the slide wire. a) Obtain an expression for F, the magnitude of the force exerted on the wire while it is moving at speed v. b). Show that the distance x that the wire moves before coming to rest is \frac{m v_0 R}{a^2 B^2}

i have done part a ,
the ans. is \frac{B^2 L^2 v}{R}
but for part b ,
i can just calculate half of the value of x mentioned in the question.
i did it in this way

subt. F from a to F=ma to find the acceleration
then subt. the ans. to
v^2=u^2+2as by taking v=0 and u=v.
is there any mistake?
You have a force that is proportional to the velocity. As the wire slows, the force diminishes. You cannot use the initial acceleration as a constant.
 
then , what should i do , can u give me some hints?
 
adrian116 said:
then , what should i do , can u give me some hints?
F = ma = mdv/dt = m(dv/dx)(dx/dt) = mvdv/dx

You can separate variables and integrate.
 
thx so much~
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top