Electromagnetic induction problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the direction of current in ring 2 based on its movement relative to ring 1. When ring 2 moves towards ring 1, the induced current flows in the opposite direction to ring 1, opposing the change as per Faraday's law. Conversely, if ring 2 moves away from ring 1, the induced current flows in the same direction as ring 1, effectively pulling ring 2 back towards it. The application of Fleming's right-hand rule is mentioned as a method to analyze the situation. Overall, the conclusions drawn align with the principles of electromagnetic induction.
Xaza
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://dc10.arabsh.com/i/03594/qn9gr42q192z.png

What is the direction of current in ring 2 if :

a) ring 2 moves towards ring 1
b) ring 2 moves away ring 1


The Attempt at a Solution



I used Fleming right hand rule but I'm not sure if it is true,

a) the direction same as ring 1
b) the opposite of ring 1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
So the by faradays law the change in the system will induce a current which opposes the change, so when you move the first ring closer, it will produce a current in the opposite direction to loop so that loop 2 is pushed back to its initial position.

And if loop 2 is moved away from loop 1 a current will be produced in the same direction as loop 1 so loop 2 is pull back towards loop 1.

I'm pretty sure that's right

have a look at the first and lasts posts

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=552166
 
Daniiel said:
So the by faradays law the change in the system will induce a current which opposes the change, so when you move the first ring closer, it will produce a current in the opposite direction to loop so that loop 2 is pushed back to its initial position.

And if loop 2 is moved away from loop 1 a current will be produced in the same direction as loop 1 so loop 2 is pull back towards loop 1.

I'm pretty sure that's right

have a look at the first and lasts posts

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=552166

Thank you very much Daniiel, you helped me alot
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top