Electromagnetic waves, Maxwell's Equations, Laplace?

tjkubo
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose Maxwell's displacement current was left out of the Maxwell equations. Show that , in a vacuum, the magnetic field has to have the form B = grad f(r,t), where f is any function which satisfies the Laplace equation.


Homework Equations


curl E = - dB/dt
curl B = 0
div E = 0
div B = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


The question requires us to use Maxwell's Equations, however, we're unsure which is the correct starting point. We've already looked very closely at both Gauss's Laws and the Maxwell-Faraday, but are unsure how to derive B = grad f(r,t) from these where f satisfies the Laplace Eqn.

All we know is that if we plug in B = grad f(r,t) into div B = 0, it works, but is that the most general form?
If the curl of a field = 0, doesn't that imply a conservative vector field? Meaning the field has a potential function? Is THAT correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tjkubo said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The question requires us to use Maxwell's Equations, however, we're unsure which is the correct starting point. We've already looked very closely at both Gauss's Laws and the Maxwell-Faraday, but are unsure how to derive B = grad f(r,t) from these where f satisfies the Laplace Eqn.

All we know is that if we plug in B = grad f(r,t) into div B = 0, it works, but is that the most general form?
If the curl of a field = 0, doesn't that imply a conservative vector field? Meaning the field has a potential function? Is THAT correct?

There is the vector identity that says that the curl of the gradient is zero. This is the starting point. From this it follows that B=grad F, and then substituting that into Gauss's Law gives you the Laplace equation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top