Electromagnetism: Determining Induced EMF

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the induced EMF in a problem involving electromagnetism. Participants confirm the correctness of calculations for parts a) and b) but seek clarification on part c). The direction of the magnetic field B is essential for solving part c), and there is uncertainty regarding the behavior at t=1 when the radius becomes zero. It is noted that the EMF changes polarity at that moment, indicating a reversal in current direction. Overall, understanding the magnetic field's direction is crucial for accurately determining the induced EMF.
Pi314227
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
There are 3 parts to the question:
A) Determine the induced EMF as a function of time in a circular loop lying perpendicularly to a constant magnetic field if the radius of the loop decreases by r(t) = 5(1-t).
B) Find out the values of the EMF at t= 0,0.1,0.2,...,0.8 seconds.
C) What will be the direction of the current in the loop at t=0 seconds? At what time will the direction of current get reversed?
Relevant Equations
1) Closed loop integral of EMF = -1 times the derivative with respect to time of the integral of B.n
2) Change in EMF = -1 times the derivative of B with respect to time
IMG_20200930_112032.jpg
IMG_20200930_112047.jpg
IMG_20200930_112032.jpg
IMG_20200930_112047.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work for a) and b) looks correct to me.
 
Delta2 said:
Your work for a) and b) looks correct to me.
What about part c? Could you help in that?
 
For c) i think i have to know the direction of the magnetic field B. Also i am not sure what happens at t=1 since the radius becomes zero then, but yes it looks like the EMF changes sign(polarity) at that point and hence the direction of current is reversed.
 
Delta2 said:
For c) i think i have to know the direction of the magnetic field B. Also i am not sure what happens at t=1 since the radius becomes zero then, but yes it looks like the EMF changes sign(polarity) at that point and hence the direction of current is reversed.
Right. The direction of the magnetic field B was not given. Thankyou so much for your help. Appreciate it alot! :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Delta2
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
576
Replies
16
Views
964
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
805
Back
Top