Electron accelerated through potential

AI Thread Summary
An electron accelerated through a potential V has its velocity calculated using conservation of mechanical energy, leading to the equation v = √(-2qV/m). The confusion arises from the negative charge of the electron, which requires careful consideration of the potential difference and the direction of movement. The discussion emphasizes that electric potential energy should be expressed in terms of change (ΔU) rather than initial or final states (U_f, U_i) to avoid sign errors. Consistency in defining the direction of the electric field and the charge's movement is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding these principles ensures correct application of energy conservation in electric fields.
brentd49
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I have a very basic question. An electron is accelerated through a potential V, what is the velocity? Obviously, this can be solved using conservation of mechanical energy, but why am I off by a negative?

K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f
0 + (-qV) = \frac{1}{2} m v^2 + 0
v = \sqrt{-2qV/m}

My problem must be in the initial potential energy. But I do not see how, because the potential difference is positive and the charge (electron) is negative.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy (Vq) should be positive, as the change potential is positive from + to - which is the case for a hole (+q), but an electron (-q) moves from - to +.
 
I see. So, one must consider the change in potential relative to where it starts and where it ends.

Does this mean that electric potential energy must always be written \Delta U never U_f, U_i?
 
brentd49 said:
I see. So, one must consider the change in potential relative to where it starts and where it ends.
Does this mean that electric potential energy must always be written \Delta U never U_f, U_i?

Well, whether you write it in delta notation or Uf - Ui makes no difference. The difference is the difference.

The point to notice is being consistent. For example, if you draw the electric field lines to go from positive charge to negative charge. The positive direction indicates the movement of a positive charge in the field, then the opposite holds for negative charges. Voltage can be defined as the negative of the integral of this E-field over some distance:

V = -\int\limits_{A}^{B} E \cdot dx

or the non-calculus version just incase:
V = - E \cdot \Delta x

\Delta V = V_f - V_i = \frac{\Delta U}{q} = \frac{U_f - U_i}{q}

So how consistent you are with which direction the charge is moving along the field will be important in making sure you get your signs right.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top