Electron accelerated through potential

AI Thread Summary
An electron accelerated through a potential V has its velocity calculated using conservation of mechanical energy, leading to the equation v = √(-2qV/m). The confusion arises from the negative charge of the electron, which requires careful consideration of the potential difference and the direction of movement. The discussion emphasizes that electric potential energy should be expressed in terms of change (ΔU) rather than initial or final states (U_f, U_i) to avoid sign errors. Consistency in defining the direction of the electric field and the charge's movement is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding these principles ensures correct application of energy conservation in electric fields.
brentd49
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I have a very basic question. An electron is accelerated through a potential V, what is the velocity? Obviously, this can be solved using conservation of mechanical energy, but why am I off by a negative?

K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f
0 + (-qV) = \frac{1}{2} m v^2 + 0
v = \sqrt{-2qV/m}

My problem must be in the initial potential energy. But I do not see how, because the potential difference is positive and the charge (electron) is negative.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy (Vq) should be positive, as the change potential is positive from + to - which is the case for a hole (+q), but an electron (-q) moves from - to +.
 
I see. So, one must consider the change in potential relative to where it starts and where it ends.

Does this mean that electric potential energy must always be written \Delta U never U_f, U_i?
 
brentd49 said:
I see. So, one must consider the change in potential relative to where it starts and where it ends.
Does this mean that electric potential energy must always be written \Delta U never U_f, U_i?

Well, whether you write it in delta notation or Uf - Ui makes no difference. The difference is the difference.

The point to notice is being consistent. For example, if you draw the electric field lines to go from positive charge to negative charge. The positive direction indicates the movement of a positive charge in the field, then the opposite holds for negative charges. Voltage can be defined as the negative of the integral of this E-field over some distance:

V = -\int\limits_{A}^{B} E \cdot dx

or the non-calculus version just incase:
V = - E \cdot \Delta x

\Delta V = V_f - V_i = \frac{\Delta U}{q} = \frac{U_f - U_i}{q}

So how consistent you are with which direction the charge is moving along the field will be important in making sure you get your signs right.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top