Electron and positron annihilation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the collision of an electron and a positron, both moving at 0.9c, and the resulting photon from their annihilation. Two methods are presented to calculate the wave vector, k, using conservation of momentum and conservation of energy, but they yield different results. The discrepancy arises because energy conservation alone cannot determine the direction of the photon, only its magnitude. The correct approach requires both conservation laws to find the accurate magnitude and direction of the resulting wave vector. Clarification is sought on the terms "incoming" and "outgoing" waves, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of both momentum and energy conservation in this context.
Psi-String
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Problem:An electron flies toward +x direction with velocity of 0.9c, while a positron flies toward -y direction with the same velocity. Assuming their speed is so fast that they collide and annihilate at the origin, what will be the magnitude and the direction of the wave vector of the generated photon, k?

I have two kinds of solution. One is base on conservation of linear momentum, one is base on conservation of energy, but they don't have the same result! Where went wrong??

Method 1
By conservation of momentum,

P_i = \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \hat{i} - \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \hat{j}

since the magnitude is the same in the two direction, we have

P_{photon} \cos \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

p = \gamma m_ev \sqrt{2} = \frac{h}{\lambda}

so k = \frac{2\sqrt{2}\pi m_e v}{h\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

substitute v=0.9c

k = \frac{1.8\sqrt{2} \pi m_e c}{h \sqrt{1-(0.9)^2}}

Method 2
By conservation of energy

2 \times \gamma m c^2 = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

then

k = \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda} = \frac{4 m_e c \pi}{h\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \frac{4 m_e c \pi}{h \sqrt{1-0.9^2}}

why the two method turn out different result??

thanks for help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't find the direction using energy conservation. This will give you the magnitude of the resulting wave. The momentum of the outgoing wave will the opposite of the vector sum of the incoming photons.
 
I know I can't find the direction of the produced photon by only using conservation of energy, I also need conservation of momentum. But I don't see why the magnitude won't be the same by two different methods. I don't understand your last sentence. What do you mean of "outgoing" wave and "imcoming" wave, it seems to me that there is only "outgoing" wave in the situation.

Thanks for help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top