Electron and Positron Annihilation

AI Thread Summary
An electron traveling at 0.8c annihilates with a positron at rest, producing two photons, prompting a discussion on calculating their energy. The initial momentum must be conserved, leading to the realization that the photons do not necessarily have equal momentum unless the total momentum is zero. The conversation shifts to using energy and momentum conservation principles, with one participant suggesting a center of mass frame approach for simplification. There is a consensus that employing four-vectors could streamline the problem-solving process. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying conservation laws in particle physics.
Krappy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron traveling at 0.8c annihilates with a positron that is at rest, producing two photons. One of the produced photons travels in the direction of the electron. Determine the energy of each of the photons.

Homework Equations



p_{photon} = \frac{E}{c}

P_{electron} = \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



p_i = p_f

\frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = 2p_{photon}

E = \frac{m_e 0.9 c^2}{2 \sqrt{1-0.81}} = 8.46 \times 10^{-14} JFirst of all, I already searched about this frequent topic, but didn't manage to solve the issues. My "issue" is regarding the final momentum. I assume that both photons will have the same momentum, but I don't think that's right.

Thank You ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it isn't right. I suppose you mean you assumed that both photons will have the same magnitude of momentum, though? That's only true if the total momentum is zero. You could analyze the problem in a reference frame where that is true.
 
Yes, sorry, I meant the same magnitude.

Now I tried to solve this with using both Energy and Momentum conservation and it gave me something like 10^19 eV. But I think there's an easier way to solve it. Could you please post your resolution?

Regards
 
Last edited:
Do you know how to use four-vectors?
 
Go to the center of mass frame. Solve the problem, and transform back.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top