Electron Diffraction: Calculate Crystal Plane Spacing

AI Thread Summary
A beam of electrons with 50 eV kinetic energy produces bright and dark rings on a screen after interacting with a powdered crystal sample. The observed bright rings at angles of 20 degrees and 40.7 degrees are analyzed using Bragg's diffraction equation. Initial calculations yield two different plane spacing values, resulting in a 10% discrepancy. To resolve this, the user seeks integers n and m to match the sine ratio of the angles, but concerns arise about the feasibility of large integers. Adjusting the angle by dividing by two leads to more consistent values for the crystal plane spacing.
throneoo
Messages
125
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


a beam of electrons with a kinetic energy of 50eV is incident on a powdered crystal sample. A series of bright and dark rings is observed on a screen behind the sample, as shown below (a picture which shows two concentric circles with the beam passing through the center . ) If bright rings are observed at angles of theta =20 degrees and theta =40.7 degrees to the beam direction , calculate the spacing of the planes of the crystal.

Homework Equations


bragg diffraction , p=h/lambda ,E=p^2/2m

The Attempt at a Solution


I can find the wavelength using a combination of the 2nd and 3rd equation (E=(h/lambda)^2 / 2m )

but since no further information is given regarding the order of the bright fringes at those 2 angles (e.g. the relationship between the two maxima , in which order they are in etc.) I assumed they correspond to the 1st and 2nd maxima .
using 2d sin theta=n lambda , I can get two different values of d with the two angles .

However , the discrepancy between the two values is quite huge (about 10%) . therefore I don't know how to get a consistent value .

so I decided to find two integers n and m such that n/m is approximately equal to the ratio of the sines of the angles ~ 1.906608182 (which is just from the formula) , and minimize the discrepancy of d .

but I'm afraid I would get large values of n and m just to satisfy the condition , so large they are not even physically feasible .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just realized I need to divide the angle by 2 before applying the formula . the values are much more consistent now .
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top